Advertisement
Original Contribution|Articles in Press

Evaluation of a Novel Acoustic Coupling Medium for Human Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation Applications

  • Author Footnotes
    # Andrew Strohman and Alexander In contributed equally to this work.
    Andrew Strohman
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 1 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA
    Footnotes
    # Andrew Strohman and Alexander In contributed equally to this work.
    Affiliations
    Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA

    Graduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Roanoke, VA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    # Andrew Strohman and Alexander In contributed equally to this work.
    Alexander In
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 1 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA
    Footnotes
    # Andrew Strohman and Alexander In contributed equally to this work.
    Affiliations
    Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Katelyn Stebbins
    Affiliations
    Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA

    Graduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Roanoke, VA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Wynn Legon
    Affiliations
    Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA, USA

    Center for Human Neuroscience Research, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA, USA

    Center for Health Behaviors Research, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA, USA

    School of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    # Andrew Strohman and Alexander In contributed equally to this work.

      Objective

      Single-element low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) is an emerging form of human neuromodulation. Current coupling methods are impractical for clinical bedside use. Here, we evaluate commercially available high-viscosity gel polymer matrices as couplants for human LIFU neuromodulation applications.

      Methods

      We first empirically tested the acoustic transmission of three densities at 500 kHz and then subjected the gel with the least acoustic attenuation to further tests of the effect of thickness, frequency, de-gassing and production variability.

      Results

      The highest-density gel had the lowest acoustic attenuation (3.3%) with low lateral (<0.5 mm) and axial (<2 mm) beam distortion. Different thicknesses of the gel up to 10 mm did not appreciably affect results. The gel polymers exhibited frequency-dependent attenuation at 1 and 3 MHz up to 86.6%, as well as significant beam distortion >4 mm. Poor de-gassing methods also increased pressure attenuation at 500 kHz up to 59.6%. Standardized methods of making these gels should be established to reduce variability.

      Conclusion

      Commercially available de-gassed, high-density gel matrices are a low-cost, easily malleable, low-attenuation and distortion medium for the coupling of single-element LIFU transducers for human neuromodulation applications at 500 kHz.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Baek H
        • Pahk KJ
        • Kim H.
        A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound for neuromodulation.
        Biomed Eng Lett. 2017; 7: 135-142
        • Darmani G
        • Bergmann TO
        • Butts Pauly K
        • Caskey CF
        • de Lecea L
        • Fomenko A
        • et al.
        Non-invasive transcranial ultrasound stimulation for neuromodulation.
        Clinical Neurophysiology. 2022; 135: 51-73
        • Legon W
        • Sato TF
        • Opitz A
        • Mueller J
        • Barbour A
        • Williams A
        • et al.
        Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans.
        Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17: 322-329
        • Legon W
        • Bansal P
        • Tyshynsky R
        • Ai L
        • Mueller JK
        Transcranial focused ultrasound neuromodulation of the human primary motor cortex.
        Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 1-14
        • Legon W
        • Ai L
        • Bansal P
        • Mueller JK.
        Neuromodulation with single-element transcranial focused ultrasound in human thalamus.
        Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 39: 1995-2006
        • King RL
        • Brown JR
        • Newsome WT
        • Pauly KB.
        Effective parameters for ultrasound-induced in vivo neurostimulation.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013; 39: 312-331
        • King RL
        • Brown JR
        • Pauly KB.
        Localization of ultrasound-induced in vivo neurostimulation in the mouse model.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014; 40: 1512-1522
        • Tufail Y
        • Matyushov A
        • Baldwin N
        • Tauchmann ML
        • Georges J
        • Yoshihiro A
        • et al.
        Transcranial pulsed ultrasound stimulates intact brain circuits.
        Neuron. 2010; 66: 681-694
        • Yu K
        • Niu X
        • Krook-Magnuson E
        • He B.
        Intrinsic functional neuron-type selectivity of transcranial focused ultrasound neuromodulation.
        Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 2519
        • Dallapiazza RF
        • Timbie KF
        • Holmberg S
        • Gatesman J
        • Lopes MB
        • Price RJ
        • et al.
        Noninvasive neuromodulation and thalamic mapping with low-intensity focused ultrasound.
        J Neurosurg. 2018; 128: 875-884
        • Kim HC
        • Lee W
        • Kunes J
        • Yoon K
        • Lee JE
        • Foley L
        • et al.
        Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates cortical and thalamic motor activity in awake sheep.
        Sci Rep. 2022; 29: 19274
        • Deffieux T
        • Younan Y
        • Wattiez N
        • Tanter M
        • Pouget P
        • Aubry JF.
        Low-intensity focused ultrasound modulates monkey visuomotor behavior.
        Curr Biol. 2013; 23: 2430-2433
        • Folloni D
        • Verhagen L
        • Mars RB
        • Fouragnan E
        • Constans C
        • Aubry JF
        • et al.
        Manipulation of subcortical and deep cortical activity in the primate brain using transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation.
        Neuron. 2019; 101 (e5): 1109-1116
        • Kubanek J
        • Brown J
        • Ye P
        • Pauly KB
        • Moore T
        • Newsome W.
        Remote, brain region-specific control of choice behavior with ultrasonic waves.
        Sci Adv. 2022; 202: eaaz4193
        • Yang PF
        • Phipps MA
        • Newton AT
        • Chaplin V
        • Gore JC
        • Caskey CF
        • et al.
        Neuromodulation of sensory networks in monkey brain by focused ultrasound with MRI guidance and detection.
        Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 7993
        • Lee W
        • Kim H
        • Jung Y
        • Song IU
        • Chung YA
        • Yoo SS.
        Image-guided transcranial focused ultrasound stimulates human primary somatosensory cortex.
        Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 8743
        • Mueller J
        • Legon W
        • Opitz A
        • Sato TF
        • Tyler WJ.
        Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates intrinsic and evoked EEG dynamics.
        Brain Stimul. 2014; 7: 900-908
        • Ai L
        • Bansal P
        • Mueller JK
        • Legon W.
        Effects of transcranial focused ultrasound on human primary motor cortex using 7T fMRI: a pilot study.
        BMC Neurosci. 2018; 19: 1-10
        • Fomenko A
        • Chen KHS
        • Nankoo JF
        • Saravanamuttu J
        • Wang Y
        • El-Baba M
        • et al.
        Systematic examination of low-intensity ultrasound parameters on human motor cortex excitability and behavior.
        eLife. 2020; : e54497
        • Lee W
        • Kim HC
        • Jung Y
        • Chung YA
        • Song IU
        • Lee JH
        • et al.
        Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation of human primary visual cortex.
        Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 34026
        • Nakajima K
        • Osada T
        • Ogawa A
        • Tanaka M
        • Oka S
        • Kamagata K
        • et al.
        A causal role of anterior prefrontal-putamen circuit for response inhibition revealed by transcranial ultrasound stimulation in humans.
        Cell Rep. 2022; 40111197
        • Kubanek J
        • Shi J
        • Marsh J
        • Chen D
        • Deng C
        • Cui J.
        Ultrasound modulates ion channel currents.
        Sci Rep. 2022; 6: 24170
        • Prieto ML
        • Firouzi K
        • Khuri-Yakub BT
        • Maduke M.
        Activation of piezo1 but not NaV1.2 channels by ultrasound at 43 MHz.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018; 44: 1217-1232
        • Sorum B
        • Rietmeijer RA
        • Gopakumar K
        • Adesnik H
        • Brohawn SG.
        Ultrasound activates mechanosensitive TRAAK K+ channels through the lipid membrane.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021; 118e2006980118
        • Yoo S
        • Mittelstein DR
        • Hurt R
        • Lacroix J
        • Shapiro MG.
        Focused ultrasound excites neurons via mechanosensitive calcium accumulation and ion channel amplification.
        Nat Commun. 2022; 13: 493
        • Kubanek J
        • Shukla P
        • Das A
        • Baccus SA
        • Goodman MB.
        Ultrasound elicits behavioral responses through mechanical effects on neurons and ion channels in a simple nervous system.
        J Neurosci. 2018; 38: 3081-3091
        • Blackmore J
        • Shrivastava S
        • Sallet J
        • Butler CR
        • Cleveland RO.
        Ultrasound neuromodulation: a review of results, mechanisms and safety.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019; 45: 1509-1536
        • Legon W
        • Adams S
        • Bansal P
        • Patel PD
        • Hobbs L
        • Ai L
        • et al.
        A retrospective qualitative report of symptoms and safety from transcranial focused ultrasound for neuromodulation in humans.
        Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 5573
        • Beisteiner R
        • Matt E
        • Fan C
        • Baldysiak H
        • Schönfeld M
        • Philippi Novak T
        • et al.
        Transcranial pulse stimulation with ultrasound in Alzheimer's disease—a new navigated focal brain therapy.
        Adv Sci. 2020; 71902583
        • Monti MM
        • Schnakers C
        • Korb AS
        • Bystritsky A
        • Vespa PM.
        Non-invasive ultrasonic thalamic stimulation in disorders of consciousness after severe brain injury: a first-in-man report.
        Brain Stimul. 2016; 9: 940-941
        • Reznik SJ
        • Sanguinetti JL
        • Tyler WJ
        • Daft C
        • Allen JJB.
        A double-blind pilot study of transcranial ultrasound (TUS) as a five-day intervention: TUS mitigates worry among depressed participants.
        Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 2020; 37: 60-66
        • Bystritsky A
        • Korb AS.
        A review of low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound for clinical applications.
        Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2015; 2: 60-66
        • Fomenko A
        • Neudorfer C
        • Dallapiazza RF
        • Kalia SK
        • Lozano AM.
        Low-intensity ultrasound neuromodulation: an overview of mechanisms and emerging human applications.
        Brain Stimul. 2018; 11: 1209-1217
        • Casarotto RA
        • Adamowski JC
        • Fallopa F
        • Bacanelli F.
        Coupling agents in therapeutic ultrasound: acoustic and thermal behavior.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 162-165
        • Manwar R
        • Saint-Martin L
        • Avanaki K.
        Couplants in acoustic biosensing systems.
        Chemosensors. 2022; 10: 181
        • Prada F
        • Franzini A
        • Moosa S
        • Padilla F
        • Moore D
        • Solbiati L
        • et al.
        In vitro and in vivo characterization of a cranial window prosthesis for diagnostic and therapeutic cerebral ultrasound (epub ahead of print).
        J Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 3; : 1-13
        • Prokop AF
        • Vaezy S
        • Noble ML
        • Kaczkowski PJ
        • Martin RW
        • Crum LA.
        Polyacrylamide gel as an acoustic coupling medium for focused ultrasound therapy.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003; 29: 1351-1358
        • Gorny KR
        • Hangiandreou NJ
        • Hesley GK
        • Felmlee JP.
        Evaluation of mineral oil as an acoustic coupling medium in clinical MRgFUS.
        Phys Med Biol. 2006; 52: N13-N19
        • Binkowski A
        • Riguzzi C
        • Price D
        • Fahimi J.
        Evaluation of a cornstarch-based ultrasound gel alternative for low-resource settings.
        J Emerg Med. 2014; 47: e5-e9
        • Colombo S
        • Giannopoulos A
        • Forde MC
        • Hasson R
        • Mulholland J.
        Frequency response of different couplant materials for mounting transducers.
        NDT & E Int. 2005; 38: 187-193
        • Lee W
        • Lee SD
        • Park MY
        • Yang J
        • Yoo SS.
        Evaluation of polyvinyl alcohol cryogel as an acoustic coupling medium for low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound.
        Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 2014; 24: 332-338
        • Chen P
        • Pollet AMAO
        • Panfilova A
        • Zhou M
        • Turco S
        • den Toonder JMJ
        • et al.
        Acoustic characterization of tissue-mimicking materials for ultrasound perfusion imaging research.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022; 48: 124-142
        • Quadri SA
        • Waqas M
        • Khan I
        • Khan MA
        • Suriya SS
        • Farooqui M
        • et al.
        High-intensity focused ultrasound: past, present, and future in neurosurgery.
        Neurosurg Focus. 2018; 44: E16
        • Poltawski L
        • Watson T.
        Relative transmissivity of ultrasound coupling agents commonly used by therapists in the UK.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007; 33: 120-128
        • Vinograd AM
        • Fasina A
        • Dean AJ
        • Shofer F
        • Panebianco NL
        • Lewiss RE
        • et al.
        Evaluation of noncommercial ultrasound gels for use in resource-limited settings.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2019; 38: 371-377
        • White PJ
        • Clement GT
        • Hynynen K.
        Local frequency dependence in transcranial ultrasound transmission.
        Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51: 2293-2305
        • Kim H
        • Park MA
        • Wang S
        • Chiu A
        • Fischer K
        • Yoo SS.
        PET/CT imaging evidence of FUS-mediated 18F-FDG uptake changes in rat brain: FDG PET/CT imaging of FUS-mediated functional neuromodulation.
        Med Phys. 2013; 40033501
        • Kim H
        • Lee SD
        • Chiu A
        • Yoo SS
        • Park S.
        Estimation of the spatial profile of neuromodulation and the temporal latency in motor responses induced by focused ultrasound brain stimulation.
        NeuroReport. 2014; 25: 475-479
        • Tsui BCH
        • Tsui J.
        A flexible gel pad as an effective medium for scanning irregular surface anatomy.
        Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth. 2012; 59: 226-227
        • Clement GT
        • Hynynen K.
        A non-invasive method for focusing ultrasound through the human skull.
        Phys Med Biol. 2002; 47: 1219-1236
        • Pichardo S
        • Sin VW
        • Hynynen K.
        Multi-frequency characterization of the speed of sound and attenuation coefficient for longitudinal transmission of freshly excised human skulls.
        Phys Med Biol. 2010; 56: 219-250
        • Pinton G
        • Aubry JF
        • Bossy E
        • Muller M
        • Pernot M
        • Tanter M.
        Attenuation, scattering, and absorption of ultrasound in the skull bone.
        Med Phys. 2012; 39: 299-307
        • White DN
        • Curry GR
        • Stevenson RJ.
        The acoustic characteristics of the skull.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 1978; 4: 225-252
        • Kamimura HAS
        • Wang S
        • Chen H
        • Wang Q
        • Aurup C
        • Acosta C
        • et al.
        Focused ultrasound neuromodulation of cortical and subcortical brain structures using 1.9 MHz.
        Med Phys. 2016; 43: 5730-5735
        • Ye PP
        • Brown JR
        • Pauly KB.
        Frequency dependence of ultrasound neurostimulation in the mouse brain.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016; 42: 1512-1530
        • Zhang H
        • Zhang Y
        • Xu M
        • Song X
        • Chen S
        • Jian X
        • et al.
        The effects of the structural and acoustic parameters of the skull model on transcranial focused ultrasound.
        Sensors. 2021; 21: 5962