Advertisement
Original Contribution| Volume 49, ISSUE 5, P1108-1117, May 2023

Vessel Rupture Thresholds for Vessel–Bubble Interactions Using an Earthworm Vasculature Model

      Objective

      Intravenous microbubble oscillation in the presence of ultrasound has the potential to yield a wide range of therapeutic benefits. However, the likelihood of vessel damage caused by mechanical effects has not been quantified as a function of the numerous important parameters in therapeutic ultrasound procedures. In this study, we examined the effects of microbubbles injected into the vasculature of the earthworm. It was found that the elastic properties of earthworm blood vessels are similar to those of arteries in older humans, and that earthworms are well suited to the large number of experiments necessary to investigate safety of procedures involving microbubble oscillation in sonicated vessels.

      Methods

      Microbubbles were infused into earthworm vessels, and the rupture time during sonication was recorded as a function of ultrasound frequency, pulse repetition frequency and acoustic pressure.

      Discussion

      A modified mechanical index (MMI) was defined that successfully captured the trends in rupture probability and rupture time for the different parameter values, creating a database of vessel rupture thresholds. In the absence of bubbles, the product of MMI squared and rupture time was approximately constant, indicating a possible radiation-force effect.

      Conclusion

      The MMI was an effective correlating parameter in the presence of bubbles, though the mathematical dependence is not yet apparent. The results of the study are expected to be valuable in designing more refined studies in vertebrate models, as well as informing computational models.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Alonso A
        • Reinz E
        • Jenne JW
        • Fatar M
        • Schmidt-Glenewinkel H
        • Hennerici MG
        • Meairs S.
        Reorganization of gap junctions after focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier opening in the rat brain.
        J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010; 30: 1394-1402
        • Choi JJ
        • Feshitan JA
        • Baseri B
        • Wang S
        • Tung YS
        • Borden MA
        • Konofagou EE.
        Microbubble-size dependence of focused ultrasound-induced blood–brain barrier opening in mice in vivo.
        IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010; 57: 145-154
        • Hynynen K
        • McDannold N
        • Vykhodtseva N
        • Jolesz FA.
        Non-invasive opening of BBB by focused ultrasound.
        in: Kuroiwa T Baethmann A Czernicki Z Hoff JT Ito U Katayama Y Marmarou A Mendelow BAD Reulen HJ Brain edema XII. Springer, Vienna2003: 555-558
        • Lee S
        • Jeon H
        • Shim S
        • Im M
        • Kim J
        • Kim JH
        • Lee BC.
        Preclinical study to improve microbubble-mediated drug delivery in cancer using an ultrasonic probe with an interchangeable acoustic lens.
        Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 12654
        • Mesiwala AH
        • Farrell L
        • Wenzel HJ
        • Silbergeld DL
        • Crum LA
        • Winn HR
        • Mourad PD.
        High-intensity focused ultrasound selectively disrupts the blood–brain barrier in vivo.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002; 28: 389-400
        • Sheikov N
        • McDannold N
        • Vykhodtseva N
        • Jolesz F
        • Hynynen K.
        Cellular mechanisms of the blood–brain barrier opening induced by ultrasound in presence of microbubbles.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004; 30: 979-989
        • Tung YS
        • Vlachos F
        • Feshitan JA
        • Borden MA
        • Konofagou EE.
        The mechanism of interaction between focused ultrasound and microbubbles in blood–brain barrier opening in mice.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2011; 130: 3059-3067
        • Wu SK
        • Chu PC
        • Chai WY
        • Kang ST
        • Tsai CH
        • Fan CH
        • et al.
        Characterization of different microbubbles in assisting focused ultrasound-induced blood–brain barrier opening.
        Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 46689
        • Zhao YZ
        • Lu CT
        • Li XK
        • Cai J.
        Ultrasound-mediated strategies in opening brain barriers for drug brain delivery.
        Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013; 10: 987-1001
        • Abrahao A
        • Meng Y
        • Llinas M
        • Huang Y
        • Hamani C
        • Mainprize T
        • et al.
        First-in-human trial of blood–brain barrier opening in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using MR-guided focused ultrasound.
        Nat Commun. 2019; 10: 4373
        • Anastasiadis P
        • Gandhi D
        • Guo Y
        • Ahmed AK
        • Bentzen SM
        • Arvanitis C
        • Woodworth GF.
        Localized blood–brain barrier opening in infiltrating gliomas with MRI-guided acoustic emissions–controlled focused ultrasound.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021; 118e2103280118
        • Chen KT
        • Wei KC
        • Liu HL.
        Focused ultrasound combined with microbubbles in central nervous system applications.
        Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13: 1084
        • Fan CH
        • Yeh CK.
        Microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound-induced blood–brain barrier opening for local and transient drug delivery in central nervous system disease.
        J Med Ultrasound. 2014; 22: 183-193
        • Gasca-Salas C
        • Fernández-Rodríguez B
        • Pineda-Pardo JA
        • Rodríguez-Rojas R
        • Obeso I
        • Hernández-Fernández F
        • et al.
        Blood–brain barrier opening with focused ultrasound in Parkinson's disease dementia.
        Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 779
        • Mehta RI
        • Carpenter JS
        • Mehta RI
        • Haut MW
        • Ranjan M
        • Najib U
        • et al.
        Blood–brain barrier opening with MRI-guided focused ultrasound elicits meningeal venous permeability in humans with early Alzheimer disease.
        Radiology. 2021; 298: 654-662
        • Wang F
        • Wei XX
        • Chang LS
        • Dong L
        • Wang YL
        • Li NN.
        Ultrasound combined with microbubbles loading BDNF Retrovirus to open blood–brain barrier for treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
        Front Pharmacol. 2021; 12615104
        • Carpentier A
        • Canney M
        • Vignot A
        • Reina V
        • Beccaria K
        • Horodyckid C
        • et al.
        Clinical trial of blood–brain barrier disruption by pulsed ultrasound.
        Sci Transl Med. 2016; 8: 343re2
        • Horodyckid C
        • Canney M
        • Vignot A
        • Boisgard R
        • Drier A
        • Huberfeld G
        • et al.
        Safe long-term repeated disruption of the blood–brain barrier using an implantable ultrasound device: a multiparametric study in a primate model.
        J Neurosurg. 2017; 126: 1351-1361
        • Curry EJ
        • Le TT
        • Das R
        • Ke K
        • Santorella EM
        • Paul D
        • et al.
        Biodegradable nanofiber-based piezoelectric transducer.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020; 117: 214-220
        • McDannold N
        • White PJ
        • Cosgrove GR.
        MRI-based thermal dosimetry based on single-slice imaging during focused ultrasound thalamotomy.
        Phys Med Biol. 2020; 65235018
        • Goertz DE.
        An overview of the influence of therapeutic ultrasound exposures on the vasculature: high intensity ultrasound and microbubble-mediated bioeffects.
        Int J Hyperthermia. 2015; 31: 134-144
        • Bader KB
        • Bouchoux G
        • Holland CK
        Sonothrombolysis.
        Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016; 880: 339-362
        • Dalecki D.
        Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound.
        Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2004; 6: 229-248
        • Miller DL
        • Smith NB
        • Bailey MR
        • Czarnota GJ
        • Hynynen K
        • Makin IRS
        Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Overview of therapeutic ultrasound applications and safety considerations.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2012; 31: 623-634
        • Palmeri ML
        • McAleavey SA
        • Trahey GE
        • Nightingale KR.
        Ultrasonic tracking of acoustic radiation force-induced displacements in homogeneous media.
        IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2006; 53: 1300-1313
        • Liu Y
        • Fite BZ
        • Mahakian LM
        • Johnson SM
        • Larrat B
        • Dumont E
        • et al.
        Concurrent visualization of acoustic radiation force displacement and shear wave propagation with 7T MRI.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10e0139667
        • Stride E
        • Saffari N.
        Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: a review.
        Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2003; 217: 429-447
        • Rezai AR
        • Ranjan M
        • D'Haese PF
        • Haut MW
        • Carpenter J
        • Najib U
        • et al.
        Noninvasive hippocampal blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer's disease with focused ultrasound.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020; 117: 9180-9182
        • Holland CK
        • Apfel RE.
        Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1990; 88: 2059-2069
        • Royer WE
        • Sharma H
        • Strand K
        • Knapp JE
        • Bhyravbhatla B.
        Lumbricus erythrocruorin at 3.5 Å resolution: architecture of a megadalton respiratory complex.
        Structure. 2006; 14: 1167-1177
        • Kim Y
        • Nabili M
        • Acharya P
        • Lopez A
        • Myers MR.
        Microvessel rupture induced by high-intensity therapeutic ultrasound—a study of parameter sensitivity in a simple in vivo model.
        J Ther Ultrasound. 2017; 5: 5
        • Hoerig CL
        • Serrone JC
        • Burgess MT
        • Zuccarello M
        • Mast TD.
        Prediction and suppression of HIFU-induced vessel rupture using passive cavitation detection in an ex vivo model.
        J Ther Ultrasound. 2014; 2: 14
        • Lopez A
        • Mikkilineni Y
        • Berman S
        • Khismatullin D
        • Clement GT
        • Myers MR
        Earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris: a novel microinjection vasculature in vivo invertebrate model.
        JoVE. 2021; : e62449
        • Maruvada S
        • Harris GR
        • Herman BA
        • King RL.
        Acoustic power calibration of high-intensity focused ultrasound transducers using a radiation force technique.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 121: 1434-1439
        • Roccabianca S
        • Figueroa CA
        • Tellides G
        • Humphrey JD.
        Quantification of regional differences in aortic stiffness in the aging human.
        J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014; 29: 618-634
        • Ebrahimi AP.
        Mechanical properties of normal and diseased cerebrovascular system.
        J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2009; 2: 155-162