Advertisement

Super-Resolution Image Reconstruction Using Diffuse Source Models

      Abstract

      Image reconstruction is central to many scientific fields, from medical ultrasound and sonar to computed tomography and computer vision. Although lenses play a critical reconstruction role in these fields, digital sensors enable more sophisticated computational approaches. A variety of computational methods have thus been developed, with the common goal of increasing contrast and resolution to extract the greatest possible information from raw data. This paper describes a new image reconstruction method named the Diffuse Time-domain Optimized Near-field Estimator (dTONE). dTONE represents each hypothetical target in the system model as a diffuse region of targets rather than a single discrete target, which more accurately represents the experimental data that arise from signal sources in continuous space, with no additional computational requirements at the time of image reconstruction. Simulation and experimental ultrasound images of animal tissues show that dTONE achieves image resolution and contrast far superior to those of conventional image reconstruction methods. We also demonstrate the increased robustness of the diffuse target model to major sources of image degradation through the addition of electronic noise, phase aberration and magnitude aberration to ultrasound simulations. Using experimental ultrasound data from a tissue-mimicking phantom containing a 3-mm-diameter anechoic cyst, the conventionally reconstructed image has a cystic contrast of –6.3 dB, whereas the dTONE image has a cystic contrast of –14.4 dB. (E-mail: [email protected] )

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ali M.
        • Schreib F.
        Adaptive single snapshot beamforming: A new concept for the rejection of nonstationary and coherent interferers.
        IEEE Trans Signal Process. 1992; 40: 3055-3058
        • Bethel R.
        • Shapo B.
        • Trees H.V.
        Single snapshot spatial processing: Optimized and constrained.
        Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop Proceedings. 2002; : 508-512
        • Capon J.
        High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis.
        Proc IEEE. 1969; 57: 1408-1418
        • Cekli E.
        • Cirpan H.
        Deterministic maximum likelihood method for the localization of near-field sources: Algorithm and performance analysis. IEEE International Conference on Electronics.
        Circuits and Systems. 2001; 2: 1077-1080
        • Chiao R.Y.
        • Hao X.
        Coded excitation for diagnostic ultrasound: a system developer's perspective.
        IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005; 52: 160-170
        • Ellis M.
        • Viola F.
        • Walker W.
        Diffuse targets for improved contrast in beamforming adapted to target.
        IEEE Ultrason Symp. 2007; : 216-219
        • Ellis M.A.
        • Guenther D.A.
        • Walker W.F.
        A spline-based approach for computing spatial impulse responses.
        IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007; 54: 1045-1054
        • Fernandez A.
        • Dahl J.
        • Dumont D.
        • Trahey G.
        Array elevation requirements in phase aberration correction using an 8×128 1.75 D array.
        Proc SPIE. 2003; 4687: 79
        • Frost O.L.
        An algorithm for linearly constrained adaptive array processing.
        Proc IEEE. 1972; 60: 926-935
        • Gabriel W.F.
        Adaptive processing array systems.
        Proc IEEE. 1992; 80: 152-162
        • Gauss R.C.
        • Soo M.S.
        • Trahey G.E.
        Wavefront distortion measurements in the human breast.
        Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp. 1997; : 1547-1551
        • Haykin S.
        Adaptive filter theory.
        Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ2002
        • Holfort I.K.
        • Gran F.
        • Jensen J.A.
        Broadband minimum variance beamforming for ultrasound imaging.
        IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009; 56: 314-325
        • Lavarello R.
        • Kamalabadi F.
        • O'Brien W.
        A regularized inverse approach to ultrasonic pulse-echo imaging.
        IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006; 25: 712-722
        • Levitan E.
        • Herman G.T.
        A maximum a posteriori probability expectation maximization algorithm for image reconstruction in emission tomography.
        IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1987; 6: 185-192
        • Lingvall F.
        A method of improving overall resolution in ultrasonic array imaging using spatio-temporal deconvolution.
        Ultrasonics. 2004; 42: 961-968
        • Malioutov D.
        • Cetin M.
        • Fisher J.
        • Willsky A.
        Superresolution source localization through data-adaptive regularization.
        Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop Proceedings. 2002; : 194-198
        • Misaridis T.
        • Jensen J.A.
        Use of modulated excitation signals in medical ultrasound. Part I: Basic concepts and expected benefits.
        IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005; 52: 177-191
        • Misaridis T.
        • Jensen J.A.
        Use of modulated excitation signals in medical ultrasound. Part II: Design and performance for medical imaging applications.
        IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005; 52: 192-207
        • O'Brien R.
        • Kiriakidis K.
        Single-snapshot robust direction finding.
        IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2005; 53: 1964-1978
        • Radich B.
        • Buckley K.
        Single-snapshot DOA estimation and source number detection.
        IEEE Signal Process Lett. 1997; 4: 109-111
        • Sarkar T.
        • Park S.
        • Koh J.
        • Schneible R.
        A deterministic least squares approach to adaptive antennas.
        Digital Signal Processing. 1996; 6: 185-194
        • Scharf L.L.
        Statistical signal processing: Detection, estimation and time series analysis.
        Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA1990
        • Stoughton R.
        • Strait S.
        Source imaging with minimum mean-squared error.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1993; 94: 827
        • Synnevag J.
        • Austeng A.
        • Holm S.
        Minimum variance adaptive beamforming applied to medical ultrasound imaging.
        IEEE Ultrason Symp. 2005; 2: 1199-1202
        • Tu M.
        • Gupta I.
        • Walton E.
        Application of maximum likelihood estimation to radar imaging.
        IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1997; 45: 20-27
        • Unser M.
        Splines: A perfect fit for signal and image processing.
        IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 1999; 16: 22-38
        • Van Veen B.
        Beamforming: A versatile approach to spatial filtering.
        IEEE ASSP Magazine. 1988; : 4-24
        • Viberg M.
        • Swindlehurst A.
        A Bayesian approach to auto-calibration for parametric array signalprocessing.
        IEEE Trans Signal Process. 1994; 42: 3495-3507
        • Vignon F.
        • Burcher M.R.
        Capon beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging with focused beams.
        IEEE Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008; 55: 619-628
        • Viola F.
        • Ellis M.
        • Walker W.
        Time-domain optimized near-field estimator for ultrasound imaging: Initial development and results.
        IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008; 27: 99-110
        • Wagner R.F.
        • Smith S.W.
        • Sandrik J.M.
        • Lopez H.
        Statistics of speckle in ultrasound B-scans.
        IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrason. 1983; 30: 156-163
        • Wang Z.
        • Li J.
        • Wu R.
        Time-delay-and time-reversal-based robust capon beamformers for ultrasound imaging.
        IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005; 24: 1308-1322