Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 36, Issue 10 , Pages 1561-1567, October 2010

Liver Metastases: Sulphur Hexafluoride–Enhanced Ultrasonography for Lesion Detection: A Systematic Review

  • Paolo Cabassa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Paolo Cabassa, Department of Radiology, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
  • ,
  • Shandra Bipat

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Laura Longaretti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
  • ,
  • Mario Morone

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
  • ,
  • Roberto Maroldi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

Received 27 February 2010; received in revised form 11 May 2010; accepted 11 June 2010. published online 01 September 2010.

Abstract 

This is a systematic review to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) performed with “SonoVue” (sulphur hexafluoride) in the detection of hepatic metastases. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE Databases were searched, regardless of language, for relevant articles published before December 2009. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility using a standardized form and methodological quality using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) Checklist. Sensitivity estimates were calculated on a per-patient and/or per-lesion basis. The search for published articles yielded 718 potentially relevant abstracts. Of these, 14 papers were eligible but only three articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria, which comprised a total of 450 patients (patient sample number: range 12 to 365; cancer prevalence: 14.8 to 71.2%). Estimated per-patient sensitivity ranged from 79–100%. Although the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies checklist showed the papers were of good quality, a meta-analysis was not applicable because of the lack of eligible studies. In conclusion, CEUS seems to be promising in the detection of liver metastases; however, there have not been enough studies to conduct meta-analysis. Further studies are required before this promising method can be widely used. (E-mail: paolocab@libero.it)

Key Words: Ultrasonography, Contrast agent BR1, Liver, Neoplasm metastasis, Systematic review

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(10)00295-4

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.06.004

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 36, Issue 10 , Pages 1561-1567, October 2010