Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 36, Issue 9 , Pages 1395-1404 , September 2010

Investigation of Acoustic Changes Resulting from Contrast Enhancement in Through-Transmission Ultrasonic Imaging

  • Tamara Rothstein

      Affiliations

    • Technion IIT, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Haifa, Israel
  • ,
  • Diana Gaitini

      Affiliations

    • Rambam Medical Center, Department of Medical Imaging, Haifa, Israel
  • ,
  • Zahava Gallimidi

      Affiliations

    • Rambam Medical Center, Department of Medical Imaging, Haifa, Israel
  • ,
  • Haim Azhari

      Affiliations

    • Technion IIT, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Haifa, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Assoc. Prof. Haim Azhari, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion IIT, Haifa 32000, Israel.

Received 23 May 2009 ,Revised 9 May 2010 ,Accepted 20 May 2010.

References 

  1. Apfel RE, Holland CK. Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1991;17:179–185
  2. Azhari H, Stolarski S. Hybrid ultrasonic computed tomography. Comput Biomed Res. 1997;30:35–48
  3. Azhari H, Sazbon D. Volumetric imaging using spiral ultrasonic computed tomography. Radiology. 1999;212:270–275
  4. Azhari H. Basics of Biomedical Ultrasound for Engineers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2010;
  5. Busse LJ, Miller JG. Detection of spatially nonuniform ultrasonic radiation with phase sensitive (piezoelectric) and phase insensitive (acoustoelectric) receivers. J Acoust Soc Am. 1981;70:1370–1376
  6. Chiang HR, Tiu CM, Chen SP, Chou YH, Chiou SY, Chiou HJ, et al. Automated full-field breast ultrasound possesses potential for screening breast cancer in women with dense breasts. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32:107
  7. Correas JM, Bridal L, Lesavre A, Méjean A, Claudon M, Hélénon O. Ultrasound contrast agents: Poperties, principles of action, tolerance, and artifacts. Eur J Radiol. 2001;11:1316–1328
  8. de Jong N, Frinking PJ, Bouakaz A, Ten Cate FJ. Detection procedures of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics. 2000;38:87–92
  9. Edmonds PD, Moretensen CL, Hill JR, Holland SK, Jensen JF, Schattner P, et al. Ultrasound tissue characterization of breast biopsy specimens. Ultrasonic Imaging. 1991;13:162–185
  10. Gramiak R, Shah P. Echocardiography of the aortic root. Invest Radiol. 1968;3:356–366
  11. Greenleaf JF, Bahn RC. Clinical imaging with transmissive ultrasonic computerized tomography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1981;28:177–185
  12. Jung EM, Jungius KP, Rupp N, Gallegos M, Ritter G, Lenhart M, et al. Contrast enhanced harmonic ultrasound for differentiating breast tumors - First results. Clin Hemorheol Micro. 2005;33:109–120
  13. Kettenbach J, Helbich TH, Huber S, Zuna I, Dock W. Computer-assisted quantitative assessment of power Doppler US: Effects of microbubble contrast agent in the differentiation of breast tumors. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53:238–244
  14. Kimmel E, Krasovitski B, Hoogi A, Razansky D, Adam D. Subharmonic response of encapsulated microbubbles: Conditions for existence and amplification. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:1767–1776
  15. Madjar H. Contrast ultrasound in breast tumor characterization: Present situation and future tracks. Eur J Radiol. 2001;11(Suppl 3):E41–E46
  16. Schreiman JS, Gisvold JJ, Greenleaf JF, Bahn RC. Ultrasound computed transmission tomography of the breast. Radiology. 1984;150:523–530
  17. Shipley J, Duck F, Goddard D, Hillman M, Halliwell M, Jones M, et al. Automated quantitative volumetric breast ultrasound data-acquisition system. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:905–917
  18. Simpson DH, Chin CT, Burns PN. Pulse inversion Doppler: A new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Control. 1999;46:372–382
  19. Uhlendorf V, Scholle F-D, Reinhardt M. Acoustic behaviour of current ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics. 2000;38:81–86
  20. Verbeek XAAM, Ledoux LAF, Willigers JM, Brands PJ, Hoeks APG. Experimental investigation of the pulse inversion technique for imaging ultrasound contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;107:2281–2290
  21. Verbeek XAAM, Willigers JM, Prinzen FW, Peschar M, Ledoux LAF, Hoeks APG. High-resolution functional imaging with ultrasound contrast agents based on RF processing in an in vivo kidney experiment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27:223–233

PII: S0301-5629(10)00254-1

doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.05.024

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 36, Issue 9 , Pages 1395-1404 , September 2010