Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 36, Issue 8 , Pages 1213-1220 , August 2010

Nonmedical Use of Ultrasound: Bioeffects and Safety Risk

References 

  1. Abbott JG. Rationale and derivation of MI and TI–A review. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999;25:431–441
  2. Abramowicz JS, Fowlkes JB, Skelly AC, Stratmeyer ME, Ziskin MC. Conclusions regarding epidemiology for obstetric ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:637–644
  3. American College of obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) . ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 297: Nonmedical use of obstetric ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:423–424
  4. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) . AIUM official statement: Conclusions regarding epidemiology for obstetric ultrasound. [document on the Internet]. Available at: http://www.aium.org/publications/statements.aspx2005;Accessed April 3, 2009
  5. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) . AIUM official statement: Keepsake fetal imaging. [document on the Internet]. Available at: http://www.aium.org/publications/statement.aspx2007;Accessed April 3, 2009
  6. American Pregnancy Association . Promoting reproductive and pregnancy wellness. Keepsake ultrasound pictures. [document on the Internet]. Available at: http://www.americanpregnancy.org/pregnancyhealth/commemorativeultrasound.html2000;Accessed August 20, 2007
  7. Ang ESBC, Gluncic V, Duque A, Schafer ME, Rakic P. Prenatal exposure to ultrasound waves impacts neuronal migration in mice. Proc NY Acad Sci. 2006;103:12903–12910
  8. Baby's First Images . Answers. Is ultrasound safe? [document on the Internet]. Available at: http://www.babysfirstimages.com/answers.htm2009;Accessed March 12, 2009
  9. Barnett SB. Biophysical aspects of diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26(Suppl 1):S68–S70
  10. Barnett SB. Routine ultrasound scanning in first trimester: What are the risks?. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2002;23:387–391
  11. Bellieni CV, Buonocore G, Bagnoli F, Cordelli DM, Gasparre O, Calonaci F, et al. Is an excessive number of prenatal echographies a risk for fetal growth?. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81:689–693
  12. Bello SO. How we may be missing some harmful effects of ultrasound–A hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 2006;67:765–767
  13. Bly S, Van den Hof MC. Obstetric ultrasound biological effects and safety. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005;27:572–580
  14. Campbell S, Reading AE, Cox DN, Sledmere M, Mooney R, Chudleigh T, et al. Ultrasound scanning in pregnancy: The short-term psychological effects of early real-time scans. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 1982;1-2:57–61
  15. Christiansen SB. The precautionary principle: History and origins. In: O'Riordan T, Cameron J, (eds): Interpreting the precautionary principle. London, UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd.; 1994.
  16. Chudleigh T. Scanning for pleasure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14:369–371
  17. Church CC, Miller MW. Quantification of risk from fetal exposure to diagnostic ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007;93:331–353
  18. Dalecki D. Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2004;6:229–248
  19. Doubilet PM. Entertainment ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:251–253discussion 253
  20. Edwards MJ, Saunders RD, Shiota K. Effects of heat on embryos and foetuses. Int J Hyperthermia. 2003;19:295–324
  21. Ellman LM, Sunstein CR. Hormesis, the precautionary principle, and legal regulation. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2004;23:601–611
  22. European Committee for Medical Ultrasound Safety . Thermal teratology. Eur J Ultrasound. 1999;9:281–283
  23. Fetal Fotos . Superior ultrasound. Public education. Ultrasound safety [document on the Internet]. Available at: http://www.fetalfotosusa.com/education.aspx?q=192002;Accessed April 25, 2008
  24. First Look Sonogram . Q & A. Is it safe? [document on the Internet]. Available at: http://firstlooksonogram.com/qa.htm2002;Accessed April 24, 2008
  25. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) . Center for devices and radiological health: 501(k) guide for measuring and reporting acoustic output of diagnostic ultrasound medical devices. [document on the Internet]; 1985, last updated May 29, 2009. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/510kClearances/default.htmAccessed May 30, 2009
  26. Geddes Keepsake Prenatal Ultrasound Images . General ultrasound frequently asked questions from patients. Is ultrasound safe? [document on the Internet]. Available at: http://www.geddeskeepsake.com/fac_patients.shtml2002;Accessed August 20, 2007
  27. Gilbert SG. Ethical, legal, and social issues: Our children's future. Neurotoxicology. 2005;26:521–530
  28. Goldstein BD, Carruth RS. Implications of the precautionary principle: Is it a threat to science?. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17:153–161
  29. Graham JM, Edwards MJ. Teratogen update: Gestational effects of maternal hyperthermia due to febrile illnesses and resultant patterns of defects in humans. Teratology. 1998;58:209–221
  30. Greene N, Platt LD. Nonmedical use of ultrasound: greater harm than good?. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:123–125
  31. Gressens P, Huppi PS. Are prenatal ultrasounds safe for the developing brain?. Pediatr Res. 2007;61:265–266
  32. Holland CK, Deng CX, Apfel RE, Alderman JL, Fernandez LA, Taylor KJ. Direct evidence of cavitation in vivo from diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22:917–925
  33. Horder MM, Barnett SB, Vella GJ, Edwards MJ, Wood AK. Ultrasound-induced temperature increase in guinea-pig fetal brain in utero: Third-trimester gestation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24:1501–1510
  34. Ibarreta D, Swan S. The DES story: Long-term consequences of prenatal exposure. In: Harremoes P, Gee D, MacGarvin M, Stirling A, Keys J, Wynne B (eds): Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896-2000. Environmental issue report #22. 2002 Copenhagen, European Environmental Agency: 84–92.
  35. International Organization for Standardization . Medical devices–Application of risk management to medical devices. ISO-14971 Geneva: Switzerland; 2007;
  36. James WH. Teratogenetic properties of thalidomide. Br Med J. 1965;2:1064
  37. Ji EK, Pretorius DH, Newton R, Uyan K, Hull AD, Hollenbach K, et al. Effects of ultrasound on maternal-fetal bonding: A comparison of two- and three-dimensional imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:473–477
  38. Keiding N, Budtz-Jorgensen E. The precautionary principle and statistical approaches to uncertainty. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17:147–151
  39. Lierman S, Veuchelen L. The optimisation approach of ALARA in nuclear practice: An early application of the precautionary principle. Scientific uncertainty versus legal uncertainty. Water Sci Technol. 2005;52:81–86
  40. Lilienfeld AM, Lilienfeld DE. John Snow, the Broad Street pump and modern epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1984;13:376–378
  41. Marsal K. The output display standard: Has it missed its target?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:211–214
  42. Miller MW, Brayman AA, Abramowicz JS. Obstetric ultrasonography: A biophysical consideration of patient safety–The “rules” have changed. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:241–254
  43. Miller MW, Miller HE, Church CC. A new perspective on hyperthermia-induced birth defects: The role of activation energy and its relation to obstetric ultrasound. J Therm Biol. 2005;30:400–409
  44. Miller MW, Nyborg WL, Dewey WC, Edwards MJ, Abramowicz JS, Brayman AA. Hyperthermic teratogenicity, thermal dose and diagnostic ultrasound during pregnancy: Implications of new standards on tissue heating. Int J Hyperthermia. 2002;18:361–384
  45. Montague P. The precautionary principle in a nutshell. [document on the Internet]. Available form http://www.precaution.org/lib/pp_def.htm2005;Accessed November 2, 2008
  46. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Implementation of the principle ofas low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) for medical and dental personnel. Report No. 107. Bethesda, MD, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1990.
  47. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: II. Criteria based on all known mechanisms. Report No. 140. Bethesda, MD, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 2002.
  48. National Electrical Manufacturers Association and American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Standard for real-time display of thermal and mechanical acoustic output indices on diagnostic ultrasound devices. NEMA Standards Publication UD 3-2004, NEMA, Rosslyn, VA and AIUM, Laurel, MD, 1992.
  49. National Institute of Health . NIH consensus development conference: The use of diagnostic ultrasound imaging in pregnancy. Vol 5. No 1. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1984;
  50. Newnham JP, Doherty DA, Kendall GE, Zubrick SR, Landau LL, Stanley FJ. Effects of repeated prenatal ultrasound examinations on childhood outcome up to 8 years of age: Follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:2038–2044
  51. Nyborg WL. Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part II: General review. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27:301–333
  52. O'Brien WD. Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007;93:212–255
  53. O'Brien WD, Siddiqi TA. Obstetric sonography: The output display standard and ultrasound bioeffects. Sonography in obstetrics and gynecology-principles and practice. Fleischer AC, Manning FA, Jeanty P, Romero R. (Eds) New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001:29–48.
  54. Pretorius DH, Gattu S, Ji EK, Hollenbach K, Newton R, Hull A, et al. Pre-examination and postexamination assessment of parental-fetal bonding in patients undergoing 3-/4-dimensional obstetric ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:1411–1421
  55. Rados C. FDA cautions against ultrasound ‘keepsake’ images. [document on the Internet]. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/FDAC/features/2004/104_images.html2004;Accessed August 30, 2007
  56. Resnik DB. The precautionary principle and medical decision making. J Med Philos. 2004;29:281–299
  57. Rogan WJ, Ware JH. Exposure to lead in children–How low is low enough?. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1515–1516
  58. Salvesen KA. Epidemiological prenatal ultrasound studies. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007;93:295–300
  59. Sandin P. Dimensions of the precautionary principle. Human Ecological Risk Assess. 1999;5:889–907
  60. Science and Environmental Health Network (SEHN) . The wingspread statement on the precautionary principle. [document on the Internet]. Available at http://www.sehn.org/state.html#w1998;Accessed August 2, 2007
  61. Sheiner E, Freeman J, Abramowicz JS. Acoustic output as measured by mechanical and thermal indices during routine obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1665–1670
  62. Sheiner E, Hackmon R, Shoham-Vardi I, Pombar X, Hussey MJ, Strassner HT, et al. A comparison between acoustic output indices in 2-D and 3-D/4-D ultrasound in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:326–328
  63. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Abramowicz JS. What do clinical users know regarding safety of ultrasound during pregnancy?. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26:319–325
  64. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Hussey MJ, Pombar X, Strassner HT, Freeman J, et al. First-trimester sonography: Is the fetus exposed to high levels of acoustic energy?. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007;35:245–249
  65. Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I, Pombar X, Hussey MJ, Strassner HT, Abramowicz JS. An increased thermal index can be achieved when performing Doppler studies in obstetric sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26:71–76
  66. Siddiqi TA, O'Brien WD, Meyer RA, Sullivan JM, Miodovnik M. In situ human obstetrical ultrasound exposimetry: Estimates of derating factors for each of three different tissue models. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21:379–391
  67. Siddiqi TA, Plessinger MA, Meyer RA, Woods JR. Bioeffects of diagnostic ultrasound on auditory function in the neonatal lamb. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16:621–625
  68. Sikov MR. Effect of ultrasound on development. Part 1: Introduction and studies in inframammalian species. Report of the bioeffects committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. J Ultrasound Med. 1986;5:577–583
  69. Stijkel A, Reijnders L. Implementation of the precautionary principle in standards for the workplace. Occup Environ Med. 1995;52:304–312
  70. Stratmeyer ME, Christman CL. Biological effects of ultrasound. Women Health. 1982;7:65–81
  71. Sunstein CR. The paralyzing principle. [document on the Internet]. Available at http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv25n4/v25n4-9.pdf2003;Accessed August 22, 2007
  72. Tarantal AF, Hendrickx AG. Evaluation of the bioeffects of prenatal ultrasound exposure in the cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis): I. Neonatal/infant observations. Teratology. 1989;39:137–147
  73. Tarantal AF, Hendrickx AG. Evaluation of the bioeffects of prenatal ultrasound exposure in the cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis): II. Growth and behavior during the first year. Teratology. 1989;39:149–162
  74. Taylor KJ. A prudent approach to ultrasound imaging of the fetus and newborn. Birth. 1990;17:218–221223; discussion 221–222
  75. Toms DA. Safety issues in fetal ultrasound. [Personal website on the internet]. Available at: http://fetalultrasoundsafety.net/2007;Accessed August 19, 2008
  76. Tubiana M. Conclusions. The precautionary principle: Its advantages and risks. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2000;184:969–993
  77. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology. The precautionary principle. [document on the Internet];1993. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001395/139578e.pdf. Accessed September 25, 2008.
  78. Vineis P. Scientific basis for the precautionary principle. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005;207(2 Suppl):658–662
  79. Weiss NS. When can the result of epidemiologic research not eliminate the need to invoke the precautionary principle?. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2006;6:16–18
  80. WFUMB . WFUMB symposium on safety and standardization in medical ultrasound: Issues and recommendations regarding thermal mechanisms for biological effects of ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1992;18:748
  81. Whelan EM. Can too much safety be hazardous? A critical look at the “precautionary principle” [document on the Internet]. Available at: http://www.acsh.org/healthissues/newsID.236/healthissue_detail.asp2000;Accessed July 13, 2008
  82. Ziskin MC, Barnett SB. Ultrasound and the developing central nervous system. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27:875–876

 WFUMB/ISUOG Joint Workshop on Safety of Nonmedical use of Ultrasound October 8, 2007, Florence, Italy.

PII: S0301-5629(10)00181-X

doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.04.003

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 36, Issue 8 , Pages 1213-1220 , August 2010

Article Tools