Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 459-466, March 2010

Effects of Nonlinear Propagation in Ultrasound Contrast Agent Imaging

  • Meng-Xing Tang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr Meng-Xing Tang, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
  • ,
  • Naohisa Kamiyama

      Affiliations

    • Application & Research Group, Ultrasound Division, Toshiba Medical Systems Corp., Otawara, Japan
  • ,
  • Robert J. Eckersley

      Affiliations

    • Imaging Sciences Department, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK

Received 9 September 2008; received in revised form 12 November 2009; accepted 24 November 2009. published online 05 February 2010.

Abstract 

This paper investigates two types of nonlinear propagation and their effects on image intensity and contrast-to-tissue ratio (CTR) in contrast ultrasound images. Previous studies have shown that nonlinear propagation can occur when ultrasound travels through tissue and microbubble clouds, making tissue farther down the acoustic path appear brighter in pulse inversion (PI) images, thus reducing CTR. In this study, the effect of nonlinear propagation through tissue or microbubbles on PI image intensity and CTR are compared at low mechanical index. A combination of simulation and experiment with SonoVue microbubbles were performed using a microbubble dynamics model, a laboratory ultrasound system and a clinical prototype scanner. The results show that, close to the bubble resonance frequency, nonlinear propagation through a bubble cloud of a few centimeter thickness with a modest concentration (1:10000 dilution of SonoVue microbubbles) is much more significant than through tissue-mimicking material. Consequently, CTR in regions distal to the imaging probe is greatly reduced for nonlinear propagation through the bubble cloud, with as much as a 12-dB reduction compared with nonlinear propagation through tissue-mimicking material. Both types of nonlinear propagation cause only a small change in bubble PI signals at the bubble resonance frequency. When the driving frequency increases beyond bubble resonance, nonlinear propagation through bubbles is greatly reduced in absolute values. However because of a greater reduction in nonlinear scattering from bubbles at higher frequencies, the corresponding CTR is much lower than that at bubble resonance frequency. (E-mail: mengxing.tang@imperial.ac.uk)

Key Words: Contrast agents, Nonlinear propagation, Imaging artefacts, Perfusion quantification

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(09)01659-7

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.11.011

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 36, Issue 3 , Pages 459-466, March 2010