Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 9 , Pages 1555-1563 , September 2009

Novel Automated Motion Compensation Technique for Producing Cumulative Maximum Intensity Subharmonic Images

  • Jaydev K. Dave

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
    • School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Flemming Forsberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Flemming Forsberg, Ph.D., Department of Radiology, Division of Ultrasound, Suite 763J, Main Building, 132 South 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

Received 22 August 2008 ,Revised 27 March 2009 ,Accepted 18 April 2009.

References 

  1. Atallah MJ. Faster image template matching in sum of absolute value of the differences measure. IEEE Trans Image Proc. 2001;10:659–663
  2. Averkiou M, Powers J, Skyba D, Bruce M, Jensen S. Ultrasound contrast imaging research. Ultrasound Q. 2003;19:27–37
  3. Correas J, Bridal L, Lesavre A, Mejean A, Claudon M, Helenon O. Ultrasound contrast agents: Properties, principles of action, tolerance and artifacts. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1316–1328
  4. Dave J, Forsberg F, Fernandes S, Piccoli CW, Fox TB, Merton DA, et al. Comparing cumulative maximum intensity image processing techniques for subharmonic breast imaging (abstract). J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:S40–S41
  5. Ferrara KW, Meritt CR, Burns PN, Foster FS, Mattrey RF, Wickline SA. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with US: Imaging, doppler and contrast agents. Acad Radiol. 2000;7:824–839
  6. Forsberg F, Piccoli C, Merton D, Palazzo J, Hall A. Breast lesions: Imaging with contrast-enhanced subharmonic US-initial experience. Radiology. 2007;244:718–726
  7. Forsberg F, Shi WT, Goldberg BB. Subharmonic imaging of contrast agents. Ultrasonics. 2000;38:93–98
  8. Forsberg F, Soparawala R, Merton D, Piccoli C, Palazzo J, Hall A. Quantitative analysis of contrast enhanced subharmonic breast images. IEEE Ultras Symp. 2006;1584–1587
  9. Frinking PJ, Bouakaz A, Kirkhorn J, Cate FJ, de Jong N. Ultrasound contrast imaging: Current and new potential methods. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26:965–975
  10. Gasparini G, Harris AL. Clinical importance of the determination of tumor angiogenesis in breast carcinoma: Much more than a prognostic tool. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:765–782
  11. Goldberg BB, Raichlen JS, Forsberg F. Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications, ed 2. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd; 2001;
  12. Hyde D, Habets DF, Fox AJ, Gulka I, Kalapos P, Lee DH, et al. Comparison of maximum intensity projection and digitally reconstructed radiographic projection for carotid artery stenosis measurement. Med Phys. 2007;34:2968–2974
  13. Kamiyama N, Yoshida T, Kawagishi T. Update of ultrasound contrast echo—Visualization and quantification [abstract]. Proc 8th Int Symp Ultrasound Contrast Imag. 2006;33–34
  14. Kopans DB. Breast Imaging. ed 2. Phildelphia, PA: Lippincott William & Wilkins; 1998;
  15. Manke D, Kay N, Börner P. Novel prospective respiratory motion correction approach for free-breathing coronary MR angiography using a patient-adapted affine motion model. Magn Res Med. 2003;50:122–131
  16. Ott LR, Longnecker M. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. ed 5. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury-Thompson Learning; 2001;
  17. Relf M, LeJeune S, Scott PA, Fox S, Smith K, Leek R, et al. Expression of the angiogenic factors vascular endothelial cell growth factor, acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor, tumor growth factor beta-1, platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, placenta growth factor, and pleiotrophin in human primary breast cancer and its relation to angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 1997;57:963–969
  18. Rubin GD, Rofsky NM. CT and MR Angiography: Comprehensive Vascular Assessment. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008;
  19. Shankar PM, Krishna PD, NewHouse VL. Advantages of subharmonic over second harmonic backscatter for contrast -to-tissue echo enhancement. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24:395–399
  20. Shi WT, Forsberg F. Hall A,Chiao RY, Liu JB, Miller S, Thomenius KE, Wheatley MA, Goldberg BB. Subharmonic imaging with microbubble contrast agent. Ultrason Imaging. 1999;29:79–94
  21. Shi WT, Forsberg F. Subharmonic imaging with contrast microbubbles. In:  Goldberg BB,  Forsberg F,  Raichlen JH editor. Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications. ed 2. London: Martin Dunitzp; 2001;p. 47
  22. Sugimoto K, Moriyasu F, Kamiyama N, Metoki R, Yamada M, Imai Y, et al. Analysis of morphological vascular changes of hepatocellular carcinoma by microflow imaging using contrast-enhanced sonography. Hepatol Res. 2008;38:790–799
  23. Tabar L, Dean PB. Mammography and breast cancer: The new era. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;82:319–326
  24. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 2004 Incidence and Mortality. Atlanta: GA; 2007;
  25. Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F, Bevilacqua P, Allred EN, Moore DH, et al. Tumor angiogenesis: A new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:1875–1887
  26. Wilson SR, Jang HJ, Kim TK, Iijima H, Kamiyama N, Burns PN. Real-time temporal maximum-intensity-projection imaging of hepatic lesions with contrast-enhanced sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:691–695
  27. Yang H, Liu GJ, Lu MD, Xu HX, Xie XY. Evaluation of the vascular architecture of hepatocellular carcinoma by MicroFlow imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26:461–467
  28. Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J, van de Vijver MJ, van Voorthuisen AE. Diagnosis of breast cancer: Contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology. 1999;213:413–422

 Video Clips cited in this article can be found online at: http://www.umbjournal.org.

PII: S0301-5629(09)00176-8

doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.04.016

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 9 , Pages 1555-1563 , September 2009