Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 7 , Pages 1086-1091, July 2009

The Relationship between Enhanced Intensity and Microvessel Density of Gastric Carcinoma Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

  • Li Shiyan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ultrasonography, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China
  • ,
  • Huang Pintong

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ultrasonography, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Huang Pintong, Department of Ultrasonography, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China.
  • ,
  • Wang Zongmin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China
  • ,
  • Huang Fuguang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ultrasonography, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China
  • ,
  • Zheng Zhiqiang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China
  • ,
  • Yang Yan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ultrasonography, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China
  • ,
  • David Cosgrove

      Affiliations

    • Imaging Sciences Department, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

Received 9 January 2009; received in revised form 24 February 2009; accepted 9 March 2009. published online 08 May 2009.

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to assess the value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCUS), in which intravenous microbubbles are used together with an oral contrast agent as a method to evaluate the microvascular density (MVD) of gastric cancer, and its relationship with the contrast-enhanced intensity (EI) in gastric carcinomas. Sixty-nine patients with gastric cancer were examined preoperatively using DCUS. The arrival time (AT), time-to-peak (TTP), peak (PI) and baseline (pre-injection) intensities (BI) of gastric carcinoma and normal gastric wall were measured. Contrast-enhanced intensity (PI minus BI) was calculated. A monoclonal antibody against CD34 was used to display vascular endothelial cells in the resected gastric carcinoma specimens and in normal gastric mucosal tissues, and MVD was calculated by counting CD34-positive vascular endothelial cells. The differences in AT, TTP, EI and MVD between gastric carcinoma specimens and normal gastric wall tissues were evaluated using Student's t-test. The relationships between EI and MVD in gastric cancer were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation analysis. Both EI and MVD were significantly higher in gastric carcinomas than in normal gastric wall (p<0.001). However, AT and TTP showed no significant differences between gastric carcinoma specimens and normal gastric wall tissues (p>0.05). There was a strong positive linear correlation between EI and MVD in gastric carcinoma (r=0.921, p<0.001). Double contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a useful method for evaluation of the MVD in gastric carcinomas in vivo. Contrast-enhanced intensity has a strong positive linear correlation with MVD and could form a new index for assessing angiogenesis and the biological behavior of gastric carcinomas. (E-mail: huangpintong@126.com)

Key Words: Microvessel density, Gastric carcinoma, Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(09)00110-0

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.03.010

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 7 , Pages 1086-1091, July 2009