Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 8 , Pages 1344-1351, August 2009

Effects of Ultrasound Beam Angle and Surface Roughness on the Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters of Articular Cartilage

  • E. Kaleva

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics and Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Kuopio, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
    • Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Erna Kaleva, M.Sc., Department of Physics, University of Kuopio, POB 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.
  • ,
  • S. Saarakkala

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics and Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Kuopio, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
  • ,
  • J.S. Jurvelin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics and Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Kuopio, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
    • Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
  • ,
  • T. Virén

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics and Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Kuopio, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
  • ,
  • J. Töyräs

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics and Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Kuopio, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
    • Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland

Received 24 April 2008; received in revised form 18 February 2009; accepted 9 March 2009. published online 22 June 2009.

Abstract 

High-resolution arthroscopic ultrasound imaging provides a potential quantitative technique for the diagnostics of early osteoarthritis. However, an uncontrolled, nonperpendicular angle of an ultrasound beam or the natural curvature of the cartilage surface may jeopardize the reliability of the ultrasound measurements. We evaluated systematically the effect of inclining an articular surface on the quantitative ultrasound parameters. Visually intact (n = 8) and mechanically degraded (n = 6) osteochondral bovine patella samples and spontaneously fibrillated (n = 1) and spontaneously proteoglycan depleted (n = 1) osteochondral human tibial samples were imaged using a 50-MHz scanning acoustic system. The surface of each sample was adjusted to predetermined inclination angles (0, 2, 5 and 7°) and five ultrasound scan lines along the direction of the inclination were analyzed. For each scan line, reflection coefficient (R), integrated reflection coefficient (IRC) and ultrasound roughness index (URI) were calculated. Nonperpendicularity of the cartilage surface was found to affect R, IRC and URI significantly (p < 0.05). Importantly, all ultrasound parameters were able to distinguish (p < 0.05) the mechanically degraded samples from the intact ones even though the angle of incidence of the ultrasound beam varied between 0 and 5° among the samples. Diagnostically, the present findings are important because the natural curvature of the articular surface varies, and a perfect perpendicularity between the ultrasound beam and the surface of the cartilage may be challenging to achieve in a clinical measurement. (Email: erna.kaleva@uku.fi)

Key Words: Cartilage, Ultrasound, Inclination, Roughness, Osteoarthritis, Scattering, Reflection, Fibrillation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(09)00109-4

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.03.009

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 8 , Pages 1344-1351, August 2009