Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 6 , Pages 912-919 , June 2009

In vivo Performance Evaluation of Bi-Directional Ultrasonic Axial Transmission for Cortical Bone Assessment

  • M. Talmant

      Affiliations

    • Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Paramétrique, Paris, France
    • CNRS LIP UMR7623, Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Maryline Talmant, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Paramétrique CNRS UMR 7623, 15 rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, F-75006 Paris, France.
  • ,
  • S. Kolta

      Affiliations

    • Centre d'Evaluation des maladies Osseuses, Hopital Cochin, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Ch. Roux

      Affiliations

    • Centre d'Evaluation des maladies Osseuses, Hopital Cochin, Paris, France
  • ,
  • D. Haguenauer

      Affiliations

    • Service de Gérontologie, Hopital Sainte Périne, Paris, France
  • ,
  • I. Vedel

      Affiliations

    • Service de Gérontologie, Hopital Sainte Périne, Paris, France
  • ,
  • B. Cassou

      Affiliations

    • Service de Gérontologie, Hopital Sainte Périne, Paris, France
  • ,
  • E. Bossy

      Affiliations

    • Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Paramétrique, Paris, France
    • CNRS LIP UMR7623, Paris, France
  • ,
  • P. Laugier

      Affiliations

    • Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Paramétrique, Paris, France
    • CNRS LIP UMR7623, Paris, France

Received 24 July 2008 ,Revised 24 November 2008 ,Accepted 10 December 2008.

References 

  1. Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, Hans D, Genant HK, Heller M, et al. A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: First results of precision and fracture discrimination. J Clin Densitom. 2000;3:1–7
  2. Bossy E, Talmant M, Defontaine M, Patat F, Laugier P. Bidirectional axial transmission can improve accuracy and precision of ultrasonic velocity measurement in cortical bone: A validation on test materials. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004;51:71–79
  3. Bossy E, Talmant M, Laugier P. Effect of bone cortical thickness on velocity measurements using ultrasonic axial transmission: A 2D simulation study. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112:297–307
  4. Bossy E. Evaluation ultrasonore de l'os cortical par transmission axiale: Modélisation et expérimentation in vitro et in vivo, PhD thesis report, University Paris 6, 2004.
  5. Raum K, Leguerney I, Chandelier F, Bossy E, Talmant M, Saï A, et al. An in vitro study of the ultrasonic axial transmission technique at the radius: 1 MHz velocity measurement are sensitive to both mineralization and intracortical porosity. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:1548–1556
  6. Camus E, Talmant M, Berger G, Laugier P. Analysis of the axial transmission technique for the assessment of skeletal status. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;108:3058–3065
  7. Clowes J, Peel N, Eastell R. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: An approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice. Osteoporosis Int. 2006;17:12931302
  8. Drake WM, McClung M, Njeh CF, Genant HK, Rosen C, Watts N, et al. Multisite bone ultrasound measurement on North American female reference population. J Clin Densitom. 2001;4:239–248
  9. Durosier C, Hans D, Krieg M-A, Schott A-M. Prediction and discrimination of osteoporotic hip fracture in postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom. 2006;9:475–495
  10. Foldes AJ, Rimon A, Keinan DD, Popovtzer MM. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia: A novel approach for assessment of bone status. Bone. 1995;17:363–367
  11. Hans D, Srivastav SK, Singal C, Barkmann R, Njeh CF, Kantorovich E, et al. Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture?. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:644–651
  12. Hans D, Genton L, Allaoua S, Pichard C, Slosman DO. Hip fracture discrimination study: QUS of the radius and the calcaneum. J Clin Densitom. 2003;6:163–172
  13. Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, Sebert JL, Cormier C, Kotzki PO, et al. Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: The EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet. 1996;348:511–514
  14. Hans D, Durosier C, Kanis JA, Johansson H, Schott-Pethelaz AM, Krieg MA, et al. Ten-year probability of osteoporotic hip fracture in 12958 elderly women combining clinical factors and heel bone ultrasound: The combined “SEMOF plus EPIDOS” prospective cohort. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:S55-S55
  15. Hui SL, Gao S, Zhou XH, Johnston CC, Lu Y, Glüer CC, et al. Universal standardization of bone density measurements: A method with optimal properties for calibration among several instruments. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:1463–1479
  16. Jansons H, Tatarinov A, Dzenis V, Kregers A. Constructional peculiarities of the human tibia defined by reference to ultrasound measurement data. Biomaterials. 1984;5:221–226
  17. Knapp KM, Blake GM, Spector TD, Fogelman I. Multisite quantitative ultrasound: Precision, age- and menopause- related changes, fracture discrimination, and T-score equivalence with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis Int. 2001;12:456–464
  18. Lefebvre F, Deblock Y, Campistron P, Ahite D, Fabre JJ. Development of a new ultrasonic technique for bone and biomaterials in vitro characterization. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:441–446
  19. Lowet G, Van der Perre G. Ultrasound velocity measurement in long bones: Measurement method and simulation of ultrasound wave propagation. J Biomech. 1996;29:1255–1262
  20. Marin F, Gonzalez-Macias J, Diez-Perez A, Palma S, Delgado-Rodriguez M. Relationship between bone quantitative ultrasound and fractures: A meta-analysis. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:1126–1135
  21. Mele R, Masci G, Ventura V, de Aloysio D, Bicocchi M, Cadossi R. Three-year longitudinal study with quantitative ultrasound at the hand phalanx in a female population. Osteoporosis Int. 1997;7:550–557
  22. Moilanen P, Nicholson PH, Kärkkäinen T, Wang Q, Timonen J, Cheng S. Assessment of the tibia using ultrasonic guided waves in pubertal girls. Osteoporosis Int. 2003;14:1020–1027
  23. Moilanen P, Nicholson PHF, Kilappa V, Cheng SL, Timonen J. Assessment of the cortical bone thickness using ultrasonic guided waves: Modelling and in vitro study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:254–262
  24. Muller M, Moilanen P, Bossy E, Nicholson P, Kilappa V, Timonen J, et al. Comparison of three ultrasonic axial transmission methods for bone assessment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:633–642
  25. Nicholson PHF, Moilanen P, Karkkainen T, Timonen J, Cheng SL. Guided ultrasonic waves in long bones: Modelling, experiment and in vivo application. Physiol Meas. 2002;23:755–768
  26. Njeh CF, Hans D, Fuerst T, Glüer C-C, Genant H. Quantitative Ultrasound—Assessment of Osteoporosis and Bone Status. London: Martin Dunitz; 1999;
  27. Raum K, Leguerney I, Chandelier F, Bossy E, Talmant M, Saï A, et al. Bone microstructure and elastic tissue properties are reflected in QUS axial transmission measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:1225–1235
  28. Schott AM, Hans D, Duboeuf F, Dargent-Molina P, Hajri T, Bréart G, et al. EPIDOS Study Group. Quantitative ultrasound parameters as well as bone mineral density are better predictors of trochanteric than cervical hip fractures in elderly women. Results from the EPIDOS study. Bone. 2005;37:858–863
  29. Steinschneider M, Hagag P, Rapoport MJ, Weiss M. Discordant effect of body mass index on bone mineral density and speed of sound. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2003;4:15
  30. Tatarinov A, Sarvazyan N, Sarvazyan A. Use of multiple acoustic wave modes for assessment of long bones. Model study. Ultrasonics. 2005;43(8):672–680
  31. Weiss M, Ben-Shlomo AB, Hagag P, Rapoport M. Reference database for bone speed of sound measurement by a novel quantitative multi-site ultrasound device. Osteoporosis Int. 2000;11:688–696
  32. Weiss M, Ben-Shlomo A, Hagag P, Ish-Shalom S. Discrimination of proximal hip fracture by quantitative ultrasound measurement at the radius. Osteoporosis Int. 2000;11:411–416
  33. Wildner M, Peters A, Raghuvanshi V, Hohnloser J, Sichert U. Superiority of age and weight as variables in predicting osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int. 2003;14:950–956

PII: S0301-5629(08)00598-X

doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.12.008

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 6 , Pages 912-919 , June 2009