Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 6 , Pages 912-919, June 2009

In vivo Performance Evaluation of Bi-Directional Ultrasonic Axial Transmission for Cortical Bone Assessment

  • M. Talmant

      Affiliations

    • Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Paramétrique, Paris, France
    • CNRS LIP UMR7623, Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Maryline Talmant, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Paramétrique CNRS UMR 7623, 15 rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, F-75006 Paris, France.
  • ,
  • S. Kolta

      Affiliations

    • Centre d'Evaluation des maladies Osseuses, Hopital Cochin, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Ch. Roux

      Affiliations

    • Centre d'Evaluation des maladies Osseuses, Hopital Cochin, Paris, France
  • ,
  • D. Haguenauer

      Affiliations

    • Service de Gérontologie, Hopital Sainte Périne, Paris, France
  • ,
  • I. Vedel

      Affiliations

    • Service de Gérontologie, Hopital Sainte Périne, Paris, France
  • ,
  • B. Cassou

      Affiliations

    • Service de Gérontologie, Hopital Sainte Périne, Paris, France
  • ,
  • E. Bossy

      Affiliations

    • Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Paramétrique, Paris, France
    • CNRS LIP UMR7623, Paris, France
  • ,
  • P. Laugier

      Affiliations

    • Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Paramétrique, Paris, France
    • CNRS LIP UMR7623, Paris, France

Received 24 July 2008; received in revised form 24 November 2008; accepted 10 December 2008. published online 26 February 2009.

Abstract 

Our objective was to assess a new quantitative ultrasound device suitable for the measurement of speed of sound in radius. The so-called “bidirectional” technique allows an accurate estimation of velocity based on a compensation for soft tissue effects implemented directly inside the probe. Velocity measurements at 1 MHz of the first arriving signal were performed at the one third distal radius in 358 enrolled women. The average velocity by age decade increases to a peak velocity of 4043 m/s in the class 30–39 y (n = 19) and decreases thereafter. Fracture discrimination was investigated on the subset of the population for which dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement was available, in addition to first arriving signal velocity measurements. The study group consisted of 122 postmenopausal women without history of fracture (group NF) and 44 postmenopausal patients (group F) with osteoporotic fractures (hip, spine, Colles fracture). When adjusted for age and bone mass index, the odds ratio (OR) for fracture prediction by ultrasound velocity, was 1.81 (1.21; 2.70) and OR associated to neck femur BMD was 2.07 (1.31–3.29). For the full model including age and body mass index as cofactors, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77, either for ultrasound velocity or neck femur bone mineral density. Despite the small population and the variety of fractures in the fracture group, our data indicate that the velocity of the first arriving signal measured by bidirectional technique discriminates patients with osteoporotic fracture from controls. (E-mail: Maryline.Talmant@lip.bhdc.jussieu.fr)

Key Words: Speed of sound, Osteoporosis, Elastic bulk waves, Quantitative ultrasound

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(08)00598-X

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.12.008

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 6 , Pages 912-919, June 2009