Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 237-244, February 2009

Effects of Therapeutic Ultrasound on Joint Mobility and Collagen Fibril Arrangement in the Endomysium of Immobilized Rat Soleus Muscle

  • Minoru Okita

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Sakamoto Nagasaki, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Minoru Okita, Ph.D., Unit of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8520 Japan
  • ,
  • Jiro Nakano

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Sakamoto Nagasaki, Japan
  • ,
  • Hideki Kataoka

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation, Nagasaki Memorial Hospital, Fukahori, Nagasaki, Japan
  • ,
  • Junya Sakamoto

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation, Nagasaki Memorial Hospital, Fukahori, Nagasaki, Japan
  • ,
  • Tomoki Origuchi

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Sakamoto Nagasaki, Japan
  • ,
  • Toshiro Yoshimura

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Sakamoto Nagasaki, Japan

Received 10 March 2008; received in revised form 21 June 2008; accepted 1 September 2008. published online 17 November 2008.

Abstract 

This study examined effects of therapeutic ultrasound on joint mobility and collagen fibril arrangement in the endomysium of immobilized rat soleus muscle. Twenty-two male Wistar rats were divided randomly into control (n = 5) and experimental groups (n = 17). In the experimental group, bilateral ankle joints of each rat were fixed in full plantar flexion with a plaster cast over a 4-wk period. Five animals in the experimental group were immobilized throughout the 4-wk (immobilization group) period, whereas the remaining rats in the experimental group were randomly divided into the ultrasound (US, n = 6) and sham (n = 6) treatment groups. Under anesthesia, continuous ultrasonic energy (frequency, 1 MHz; intensity, 1.0 W/cm2) was delivered to the triceps surae muscle of the US group for 15 min per d, 6 d per wk over the 4-wk immobilization period. Ultrasonic energy was not delivered to the triceps surae muscle in sham animals; only the transducer head was moved. Ankle joint mobility on dorsiflexion in the immobilization, sham and US groups was significantly smaller than that of the control group, whereas in the US group, this parameter was significantly greater than in the immobilization and sham groups. Collagen fibril arrangement in the endomysium of the control and US groups was longitudinal to the axis of the muscle fibers; in contrast, it was circumferential in the immobilization and sham groups. Our findings revealed that joint immobilization induces decreased joint mobility and collagen fibril movement in the endomysium; furthermore, ultrasound treatment can prevent these changes. We hypothesized that therapeutic ultrasound during the immobilization process may inhibit deterioration of muscle contracture. (E-mail: mokita@nagasaki-u.ac.jp)

Key Words: Ultrasound, Immobilization, Joint mobility, Collagen fibril arrangement, Endomysium

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(08)00404-3

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.09.001

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 237-244, February 2009