Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 34, Issue 11 , Pages 1758-1764, November 2008

Contrast-Enhanced Transrectal Ultrasound for Assessing Vascularization of Hypoechoic BPH Nodules in the Transition and Peripheral Zones: Comparison with Pathological Examination

  • Jing Chun Yang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ultrasound, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
  • ,
  • Jie Tang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ultrasound, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Jie Tang, MD, Department of Ultrasound, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China
  • ,
  • Yanmi Li

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ultrasound, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
  • ,
  • Xiang Fei

      Affiliations

    • Department of Ultrasound, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China
  • ,
  • Huaiyin Shi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China

Received 11 December 2007; received in revised form 15 March 2008; accepted 16 April 2008. published online 05 June 2008.

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to investigate the vascularization of zonal location of hypoechoic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) nodules and to evaluate the clinical value of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CETRUS) for assessing vascularity of hypoechoic BPH nodules. Sixty-two patients with hypoechoic biopsy-proven BPH nodules in transition zone (TZ) (32 patients) or peripheral zone (PZ) (30 patients) of the prostate gland underwent CETRUS examination between January 2006 and September 2006. The enhancement characteristics of hypoechoic BPH nodules were observed and time to enhancement (AT), time to peak intensity (TTP) and peak intensity (PI) were measured with ACQ time-intensity curve analysis software. In addition, microvessel density (MVD) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) immunoreactivity were determined in the biopsy specimens. Microvessels were identified by immunohistochemical staining of endothelial cells for CD34. Findings were compared between hypoechoic BPH nodules located in PZ and TZ. The most common enhancement characteristic of hypoechoic BPH nodules in PZ was nonenhanced area inside (21/30), while most of hypoechoic BPH nodules in TZ appeared homogeneous enhancement (28/32). The average AT and TTP were significantly longer, the average PI was significantly lower in hypoechoic BPH nodules located in PZ than TZ (p < 0.01). The VEGF expression and MVD were significantly higher in hypoechoic BPH nodules located in TZ than PZ (p < 0.01). PI was found to be an important parameter strongly correlated with degree of vascularity of hypoechoic BPH nodules. Hypoechoic BPH nodules located in PZ and TZ showed significant difference in vascularization, which indirectly verified our finding that BPH nodule could occur in the peripheral zone. CETRUS could afford information on the vascularity of hypoechoic BPH nodules in a noninvasive manner and this could be used to improve selection of nodules for biopsy. (E-mail: yjc301301@163.com)

Key Words: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), Ultrasound, Contrast agent, microvessel density (MVD), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(08)00198-1

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.04.009

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 34, Issue 11 , Pages 1758-1764, November 2008