Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 34, Issue 11 , Pages 1711-1716, November 2008

Intraobserver and Interobserver Agreement of Grayscale Typical Ultrasonographic Patterns for the Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer

  • Stefano Guerriero

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Stefano Guerriero, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the University of Cagliari, Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio, Via Ospedale 46, 09124, Cagliari, Italy
  • ,
  • Juan Luis Alcazar

      Affiliations

    • Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • ,
  • Maria Angela Pascual

      Affiliations

    • Instituto Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Silvia Ajossa

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
  • ,
  • Marta Gerada

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
  • ,
  • Roberta Bargellini

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
  • ,
  • Bruna Virgilio

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
  • ,
  • Gian Benedetto Melis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

Received 19 November 2007; received in revised form 27 March 2008; accepted 11 April 2008. published online 05 June 2008.

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver agreement for identifying ovarian malignancy using typical grayscale ultrasonographic patterns. Digitally stored grayscale sonographic images from a random sample of 98 women with an adnexal mass submitted to surgery after a grayscale transvaginal sonography were evaluated by five different examiners with different degrees of experience in three European university departments of obstetrics and gynecology. Masses in which the echo features were highly characteristic of a benign pathology were categorized as benign. Any cystic mass containing excrescences, thick septations, multiple irregular septations or solid component in which the echo architecture was not highly suggestive of benign histology was categorized as malignant. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement according to the level of experience were assessed by calculating the kappa index. Of the 98 cases randomly selected, 28 (29%) were malignant masses and 70 (71%) were benign. Intraobserver agreement was good or very good for all examiners with different degrees of experience (kappa = 0.72 to 1). Interobserver agreement was good for all expert operators (kappa = 0.69 to 0.75). Interobserver agreement between experts and highly experienced operators was moderate or good (kappa = 0.51 to 0.63). Interobserver agreement between the moderately experienced operator and experts was fair to moderate (kappa = 0.29 to 0.46). Interobserver agreement between moderately and highly experienced operators was fair (kappa = 0.33). Our results indicate that ultrasonographic malignant patterns are reproducible, even in moderately experienced examiners, although more experience is associated with better interobserver agreement. (E-mail: gineca.sguerriero@tiscali.it)

Key Words: Reproducibility, Transvaginal ultrasonography, Ovarian cancer

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(08)00186-5

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.04.007

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 34, Issue 11 , Pages 1711-1716, November 2008