Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 34, Issue 11 , Pages 1724-1731, November 2008

Real-Time Myocardial Contrast Stress Echocardiography Using Bolus Application

  • Gerald H. Wasmeier

      Affiliations

    • The 2nd Medical Clinic, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • ,
  • Sven Asmussen

      Affiliations

    • The 2nd Medical Clinic, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • ,
  • Jens-Uwe Voigt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Frank A. Flachskampf

      Affiliations

    • The 2nd Medical Clinic, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • ,
  • Werner G. Daniel

      Affiliations

    • The 2nd Medical Clinic, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • ,
  • Uwe Nixdorff

      Affiliations

    • European Prevention Center, Duisburg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Uwe Nixdorff, M.D., F.E.S.C., Associate Professor, European Prevention Center, Ruhrorter Strasse 195, D-47119 Duisburg, Germany

Received 27 February 2007; received in revised form 25 October 2007; accepted 19 March 2008. published online 16 May 2008.

Abstract 

In myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), power modulation technique may quantify myocardial perfusion in real-time. However, constant infusion of the contrast agent (CA) complicates handling. This pilot study sought for the clinical feasibility of quantitative MCE by a CA bolus application during Adenosine stress echocardiography to diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD). Twenty-four consecutive patients (pts) with contemporary coronary angiography underwent rest and maximum Adenosine stress. Signal intensity could be calculated in 316/348 left ventricular (LV) segments (91%) (18-segment model). At rest, gamma-variate (alpha) as well as saturation function (beta) was not significantly different in healthy men (n = 268) as well as CAD pts (n = 48) (alpha: 0.34 s-1 versus 0.40 s−1, n.s.; beta: 0.31 s−1 versus 0.35 s−1, n.s.). During Adenosine infusion both values increased in healthy men (alpha: 0.34 ± 0.37 s−1 versus 0.44 ± 0.45 s−1, p < 0.05; beta: 0.31 ± 0.33 s−1 versus 0.40 ± 0.40 s−1, p < 0.01), but not in CAD (alpha: 0.40 ± 0.35 s−1 versus 0.29 ± 0.29 s−1, n.s.; beta: 0.35 ± 0.32 s−1 versus 0.27 ± 0.30 s−1, n.s.). Sensitivity of alpha/beta reserve ≤1 was 65%/67% (specificity 66%/67%) and improved to 88% in both if also wall motion analysis was considered (specificity 59%/65%). A very high negative predictive value of 96%/97% favours the method for excluding CAD. Bolus administration of CA is feasible in quantitative real-time MCE. However, additional consideration of wall motion analysis is required for reasonable sensitivity. Very high negative predictive values favour the potential of the method in excluding the diagnosis. Further need of research work may be encouraged by those findings. (E-mail: nixdorff@ecp-checkup.de)

Key Words: Myocardial contrast echocardiography, Power Doppler modulation, Myocardial perfusion, Wall motion analysis, Coronary artery disease

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(08)00150-6

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.03.017

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 34, Issue 11 , Pages 1724-1731, November 2008