Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 34, Issue 11 , Pages 1765-1769, November 2008

Percutaneous Renal Intervention: Comparison of 2-D and Time-Resolved 3-D (4-D) Ultrasound for Minimal Calyceal Dilation Using an Ultrasound Phantom and Fluoroscopic Control

  • Babbin S. John

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Mr Babbin S. John, MRCS, The Urology Research Office, Ingleby House, St. George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK, SW17 0QT
  • ,
  • David Rowland

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • Lakshmi Ratnam

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • Miles Walkden

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • Siew Nayak

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • Uday Patel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • Ken Anson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • Dariush Nassiri

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, St. George's Hospital, London, UK

Received 17 January 2008; received in revised form 3 March 2008; accepted 14 March 2008. published online 16 May 2008.

Abstract 

The rapid advances made by ultrasound in recent years have increasingly taken 3-D ultrasound (3DUS) and 4-D ultrasound (4DUS) from the research setting to the patient's bedside. There are still unexplored areas like renal percutaneous intervention, where 4DUS has yet to be proven an effective tool. Ultrasound-only guidance in renal percutaneous access is used in selected well-dilated pelvi-calyceal systems (PCS), and fluoroscopy is often utilized as an adjunct. Our aim was to compare 2-D and 4-D guidance for punctures, with fluoroscopy as control, using an in vitro ultrasound phantom. Agar and latex were the tissue-mimicking materials used for the construction of the phantom. The latex targets were designed to simulate multidirection-facing minimally dilated renal calyces. Two interventional fellows punctured the “calyces” using first 2DUS and then 4DUS guidance, making use of a different set of targets each time. The time to puncture, time to introduction of wire, quality of puncture (judged on fluoroscopy) and global rating of both modalities were documented. There was no significant difference between the times to puncture using 2DUS (1.8 min) and 4DUS (2 min). Nor was there a significant difference in the quality of puncture. 4DUS had a higher median difficulty rating. The multiplanar reformatted (MPR) longitudinal and transverse images were found to be the most useful for needle guidance. Cross hairs in all MPR images were not just useful in aligning the images on target but also as surrogate targets. The phantom was found to be robust, with only one instance of air introduction after 30 punctures. We have found that 4DUS is at least as good as 2DUS in terms of quality of punctures in vitro. The technology still has some way to go as frame rates, transducer size and resolution improve. (E-mail: babbinj@yahoo.com)

Key Words: Ultrasonography, Three-dimensional imaging, Percutaneous nephrostomy, Kidney pelvis, Hydronephrosis, Imaging phantoms, Fluoroscopy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(08)00146-4

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.03.014

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 34, Issue 11 , Pages 1765-1769, November 2008