Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 33, Issue 7 , Pages 991-1009, July 2007

Freehand 3D Ultrasound Reconstruction Algorithms—A Review

  • Ole Vegard Solberg

      Affiliations

    • SINTEF Health Research; Medical Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    • National Center for 3D Ultrasound in Surgery, Trondheim, Norway
    • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Faculty of Medicine; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Trondheim, Norway
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Ole Vegard Solberg, SINTEF Health Research, Medical Technology, 7465 Trondheim, Norway.
  • ,
  • Frank Lindseth

      Affiliations

    • SINTEF Health Research; Medical Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    • National Center for 3D Ultrasound in Surgery, Trondheim, Norway
  • ,
  • Hans Torp

      Affiliations

    • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Faculty of Medicine; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Trondheim, Norway
  • ,
  • Richard E. Blake

      Affiliations

    • NTNU, Faculty of Information Technology, Mathematics and Electrical Engineering; Department of Computer and Information Science, Trondheim, Norway
  • ,
  • Toril A. Nagelhus Hernes

      Affiliations

    • SINTEF Health Research; Medical Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    • National Center for 3D Ultrasound in Surgery, Trondheim, Norway
    • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Faculty of Medicine; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Trondheim, Norway

Received 21 July 2006; received in revised form 31 January 2007; accepted 25 February 2007. published online 21 May 2007.

Abstract 

Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) is increasingly being introduced in the clinic, both for diagnostics and image guidance. Although dedicated 3D US probes exist, 3D US can also be acquired with the still frequently used two-dimensional (2D) US probes. Obtaining 3D volumes with 2D US probes is a two-step process. First, a positioning sensor must be attached to the probe; second, a reconstruction of a 3D volume can be performed into a regular voxel grid. Various algorithms have been used for performing 3D reconstruction based on 2D images. Up till now, a complete overview of the algorithms, the way they work and their benefits and drawbacks due to various applications has been missing. The lack of an overview is made clear by confusions about algorithm and group names in the existing literature. This article is a review aimed at explaining and categorizing the various algorithms into groups, according to algorithm implementation. The algorithms are compared based on published data and our own laboratory results. Positive and practical uses of the various algorithms for different applications are discussed, with a focus on image guidance. (E-mail: ole.v.solberg@sintef.no)

Key Words: 3D ultrasound, Reconstruction methods, Positioning, Freehand acquisition, 3D imaging, Ultrasound compounding

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(07)00108-1

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.02.015

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 33, Issue 7 , Pages 991-1009, July 2007