Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 33, Issue 6 , Pages 915-923, June 2007

Rapid 3D Imaging of Contrast Flow: Demonstration of a Dual Beam Technique

  • Nelson G. Chen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • ,
  • J. Brian Fowlkes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Paul L. Carson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Gerald L. LeCarpentier

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Gerald L. LeCarpentier, PhD, University of Michigan Department of Radiology, Basic Radiological Sciences, 200 Zina Pitcher Place Rm 3315, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0553, USA.

Received 7 November 2005; received in revised form 21 October 2006; accepted 26 October 2006. published online 10 May 2007.

Abstract 

Perfusion imaging in a 3D volume using ultrasound contrast agent may improve vascular characterization compared with 2D imaging. Conventional 3D acquisition requires excessive scan time. A dual transducer technique using conventional systems has been introduced that allows 3D imaging of contrast dynamics with drastically reduced scan times (LeCarpentier et al. 2003). Two transducers are translated across a volume where the leading transducer effects contrast clearance and the following transducer images at desired contrast refill times. With 2D arrays that allow simultaneous clearance and imaging pulses, scan times could be further reduced and the need for two transducers eliminated. The dual transducer technique was demonstrated on a tube phantom, with observed contrast profiles matching those expected. Measured center velocities of (± std dev) 1.46 ± 0.21 and 2.25 ± 0.5 did not statistically differ from expected values of 1.75 and 2.50 (all mm/s), (p > 0.05). This technique is introduced for rapid acquisition of 3D contrast refill images. (E-mail: gllec@umich.edu)

Key Words: Contrast refill, Perfusion, Blood flow, Imaging, Vasculature, Angiogenesis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(06)01970-3

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.10.017

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 33, Issue 6 , Pages 915-923, June 2007