Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 335-341, March 2007

Prenatal Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Femur Volume: Efficacy Assessment Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound

  • Chiung-Hsin Chang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cheng Kung University Medical College, Tainan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Pei-Ying Tsai

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cheng Kung University Medical College, Tainan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Chen-Hsiang Yu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cheng Kung University Medical College, Tainan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Huei-Chen Ko

      Affiliations

    • Research Institute of Behavior Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Medical College, Tainan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Fong-Ming Chang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cheng Kung University Medical College, Tainan, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr. Fong-Ming Chang, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cheng Kung University Medical College and Hospital, 138 Victory Road, Tainan, 70428 Taiwan.

Received 1 June 2006; received in revised form 27 September 2006; accepted 5 October 2006. published online 07 February 2007.

Abstract 

As fetal growth restriction (FGR) may have increased risks with perinatal morbidity and mortality, it is very important to detect FGR prenatally. Fetal femur dysplasia is associated with a variety of congenital syndromes and FGR as well. To date, no prenatal assessment of fetal FV in predicting FGR using three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) has been reported. In this study, we used 3D US to test the efficacy of fetal femur volume (FV) measurement in predicting FGR. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and efficacy of fetal FV assessed by 3D US in detecting FGR according to the Bayes’ theorem. All the fetuses were singletons and were followed up to delivery to determine whether they were complicated with FGR or not. In total, 304 fetuses without FGR and 42 fetuses with FGR were included for FV assessment in utero by 3D US. Our results showed fetal FV assessed by 3D US can differentiate fetuses with FGR from fetuses without FGR well. The best predicting threshold for FGR is at the 10th percentile of FV. Using the 10th percentile as the cutoff, the sensitivity of fetal FV in predicting FGR was 71.4%, specificity 94.1%, positive predictive value 62.5%, negative predictive value 96.0% and accuracy 91.3%. In addition, fetal FV is superior to fetal biparietal diameter and fetal abdominal circumference in predicting FGR. In conclusion, fetal FV assessed by 3D US can be applied to detect FGR well prenatally. We believe fetal FV assessment by 3D US would be a useful test in detecting fetuses with FGR. (E-mail: fchang@mail.ncku.edu.tw)

Key Words: 3D ultrasound, Femur volume, Fetal growth restriction

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(06)01866-7

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.10.013

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 335-341, March 2007