Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 29, Issue 1 , Pages 93-102 , January 2003

Biological and environmental factors affecting ultrasound-induced hemolysis in vitro: 2. medium dissolved gas (pO2) content

  • Morton W Miller

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr. M. W. Miller, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Rochester, Box 668, Rochester NY 14642-0001, USA.
    • ,
  • E.Carr Everbach

      Affiliations

    • Department of Engineering, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, USA
    • ,
  • W.Marcus Miller

      Affiliations

    • Varian NMR Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA
    • ,
  • Linda F Battaglia

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

Received 25 February 2002 ,Accepted 27 May 2002.

References 

  1. Azadniv M, Doida Y, Miller MW, Brayman AA, Meltzer RS. Temporality in ultrasound-induced cell lysis in vitro. Echocardiography. 1996;13:45–55
  2. Bleeker HJ, Shung KK, Barnhart JL. Ultrasonic characterization of Albunex, a new contrast agent. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990;87:1792–1797
  3. Brayman AA, Miller MW. Sonolysis of Albunex®-supplemented, 40% hematocrit human erythrocytes by pulsed 1-MHz ultrasound (Pulse number, pulse duration and exposure vessel rotation dependence). Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999;25:307–314
  4. Brayman AA, Strickler PL, Luan H, Barned SL, Raeman CH, Cox C, et al. Hemolysis of 40% hematocrit, Albunex®-supplemented, human erythrocytes by pulsed ultrasound (frequency, acoustic pressure and pulse length dependence). Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;23:1237–1250
  5. Carstensen EL, Kelly P, Church CC, et al.  Lysis of erythrocytes by exposure to CW ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1993;19:147–165
  6. Church CC. The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995;97:1510–1521
  7. Cussler EL. Diffusion. Mass transfer in fluid systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1984;
  8. Everbach EC, Makin IRS, Adadniv M, Meltzer RS. Correlation of ultrasound-induced hemolysis with cavitation detector output in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;23:619–624
  9. Flynn HG, Church CC. Transient pulsations of small gas bubbles in water. JASA. 1988;84:985–998
  10. Gevantman LH. Solubility of selected gases in water. In:  Lide DR editors. CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1996;p. 6.3–6.6
  11. Kirkaldy JS, Young DJ. In: Diffusion in the condensed state. London, UK: The Institute of Metals; 1987;p. 69–126
  12. Kondo T, Kano E. Effect of free radicals induced by ultrasonic cavitation on cell killing. Int J Radiat Biol. 1988;54:475–486
  13. Kondo T, Kano E. Enhancement of hyperthermic cell killing by non-thermal effect of ultrasound. Int J Radiat Biol. 1987;51:157–166
  14. Kondo T, Gamson J, Mitchell JB, Riesz P. Free radical formation and cell lysis induced by ultrasound in the presence of different rare gases. Int J Radiat Biol. 1988;54:955–962
  15. Love LA, Kremkau FW. Intracellular temperature distribution produced by ultrasound. JASA. 1980;67:1045–1050
  16. Miller DL, Gies RA, Chrisler WB. Ultrasonically induced hemolysis at high cell and gas body concentrations in a thin-disc exposure chamber. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;23:625–633
  17. Miller MW, Azadniv M, Doida Y, Brayman AA. Effect of a stabilized microbubble contrast agent on CW ultrasound induced red blood lysis in vitro. Echocardiography. 1995;12:1–11
  18. Miller MW, Brayman AA, Sherman TS, Abramowicz JS, Cox C. Comparative sensitivity of human fetal and adult erythrocytes to hemolysis by pulsed 1-MHz ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27:419–425
  19. Miller MW, Everbach EC, Cox C, et al.  A comparison of the hemolytic potential of Optison™ and Albunex® in whole human blood in vitro (Acoustic pressure, ultrasound frequency, donor and passive cavitation detection considerations). Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27:709–721
  20. Miller MW, Miller DL, Brayman AA. A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22:1131–1154
  21. Miller MW, Sherman TS, Brayman AA. Comparative sensitivity of human and bovine erythrocytes to sonolysis by 1-MHz ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26:1317–1326
  22. NCRP (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements) . Biological effects of ultrasound. Mechanisms and clinical implications. Bethesda, MD: The Council; 1983; Report No. 74
  23. NCRP (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements). Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound. II. Criteria based on all known mechanisms Bethesda, MD: NCRP, 2002 (in press)
  24. Schaefer VH, Schwan H. Zur Frage der selektiven Erhitzung kleiner Teilchen im Ultrakurzwellen-Kondensatorfeld. Ann Phys. 1943;43:99–135
  25. Stedman’s medical dictionary, 26th ed. Spraycar M. ed. Laboratory Reference Range Values. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1995:2005
  26. Williams AR, Kubowicz G, Cramer E, Schlief R. The effects of microbubble suspension SH U 454 (Echovist®) on ultrasound-induced cell lysis in a rotating tube exposure system. Echocardiography. 1991;8:423–433

PII: S0301-5629(02)00562-8

doi: 10.1016/S0301-5629(02)00562-8

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 29, Issue 1 , Pages 93-102 , January 2003

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution