Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 507-517, April 2002

Ultrasound-based vessel wall tracking: an auto-correlation technique with RF center frequency estimation

  • Stein Inge Rabben

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Dr. Stein I. Rabben, Institute for Surgical Research, National Hospital, 0027 Oslo, Norway
    • Institute for Surgical Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • ,
  • Steinar Bjærum

      Affiliations

    • GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway
  • ,
  • Vidar Sørhus

      Affiliations

    • SimSurgery and Interventional Center, National Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • ,
  • Hans Torp

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Received 17 January 2000; accepted 16 January 2002.

Abstract 

Vessel diameter is related to the distending blood pressure, and is used in estimations of vessel stiffness parameters. The vessel walls can be tracked by integrating wall velocities estimated by ultrasound (US) Doppler techniques. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the performance of the modified autocorrelation estimator when applied on vessel wall motion. As opposed to the conventional autocorrelation method that only estimates the mean Doppler frequency, the modified autocorrelation method estimates both the mean Doppler frequency and the radiofrequency (RF) center frequency. To make a systematic evaluation of the estimator, we performed computer simulations of vessel wall motion, where pulse bandwidth, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), signal-to-reverberation ratio, packet size and sample volume were varied. As reference, we also analyzed the conventional autocorrelation method and the cross-correlation method with parabolic interpolation. Under the simulation conditions considered here, the modified autocorrelation method had the lowest bias and variance of the estimators. When integrating velocity estimates over several cardiac cycles, the resulting tissue displacement curves might drift. This drift is directly related to the magnitude of the estimator bias and variance. Hence, the modified autocorrelation method should be the preferred choice of method. (E-mail: s.i.rabben@klinmed.uio.no)

Keywords:  Ultrasound, Doppler, Vessel wall motion, Echo tracking, Autocorrelation, Cross-correlation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(02)00487-8

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 507-517, April 2002