Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 415-420, April 2002

Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in taiwan

  • Ming-Feng Hou

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Ming-Feng Hou, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100, Shih-Chuan 1st Road, 807, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
    • Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Hung-Yi Chuang

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Occupational Medicine and Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Fu Ou-Yang

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Chen-Ya Wang

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Chyi-Lie Huang

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Radiology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Hui-Mei Fan

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Chieh-Han Chuang

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Jaw-Yuan Wang

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Jan-Singh Hsieh

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Gin-Chung Liu

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Radiology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Tsung-Jen Huang

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Received 22 October 2001; accepted 9 January 2002.

Abstract 

Recommended surveillance for screening breast cancer, which includes regular mammography and clinical breast examination, has long been established in Western countries. This strategy may be too costly and unnecessary for countries with low incidences of breast cancer. The purpose of the present study is to compare breast mammography, sonography and physical examination in screening female relatives of breast cancer index cases from the hospital, and their relative efficiency. A total of 935 women over 35 years old, who were relatives of breast cancer patients, were invited to an annual screening by means of a combination of mammography, sonography and physical examination on a single day. A biopsy was performed when any of the three investigations indicated a possibility of malignancy. A total of 21 breast cancers, including sixteen invasive cancers and 5 noninvasive cancers, were detected among the 935 high-risk women. Of the cancers, 18, including 16 invasive cancers and 3 noninvasive cancers, were detected by sonography. In contrast, only 11 invasive cancers were detected by mammography, and 7 by physical examination. There were only 14 cancers detected by a combination of mammography and physical examination. The 7 (33.3%) additional cancers were detected when sonography was added. The sensitivity of sonography was 90.4%, which was higher than mammography (52.4%) and physical examination (33.3%), or even a combination of these two modalities (66.7%). This indicates that sonography is a more accurate screening tool for breast cancer in the high-risk group. Although breast sonography has not yet been recommended as a routine screening tool for breast cancer in Western countries, it may be superior to mammography and physical examination for the screening of Taiwanese high-risk female relatives of breast cancer index cases. If it should also be considered as a routine adjunct screening modality for Taiwanese women with lower rates of breast cancer will need further study. (E-mail: mifeho@kmu.edu.tw)

Keywords:  Breast cancer, Screen, Taiwan, Mammography, Sonography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(02)00483-0

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 415-420, April 2002