Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 445-451, April 2002

Comparing contrast-enhanced ultrasound to immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis in a human melanoma xenograft model: preliminary results

  • Flemming Forsberg

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Flemming Forsberg, Ph.D., Department of Radiology, Division of Ultrasound, Suite 763J, Main Building, 132 South 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107 USA
    • Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Adam P. Dicker

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Mattew L. Thakur

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Nandkumar M. Rawool

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Ji-bin Liu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • ,
  • William T. Shi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Levon N. Nazarian

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Received 17 September 2001; accepted 9 January 2002.

Abstract 

This study compared contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) measures of tumor neovascularity with molecular markers of angiogenesis in a human melanoma xenograft model. A total of 14 mice were implanted with a human melanoma cell line (WM-9) in the thigh. After 2 to 3 weeks, a tumor, approximately 12 mm in diameter, developed. The US contrast agent Optison® (Mallinckrodt, St. Louis, MO) was injected in a tail vein (dose: 0.4 to 0.6 mL/kg). Power Doppler and pulse-inversion harmonic imaging (HI) were performed with an Elegra scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, Issaquah, WA) and a 7.5 MHz linear array. Frame-rates of 30 Hz and 0.5 Hz (intermittent imaging) were used for pulse-inversion HI. After surgical removal, specimens were sectioned in the same planes as the US images. Immunohistochemical stains for endothelial cells (CD31), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) were performed. Two observers graded the stains (for intensity and percent area), and two other observers graded the US imaging modes (for fractional tumor neovascularity) on the same scale from 0 to 3. Of the 14 mice, 4 failed for technical reasons (i.e., n = 10). Linear regressions indicated statistically significant correlations between percent area stained with COX-2 and power Doppler (r = −0.789; p < 0.01), as well as intermittent pulse-inversion HI (r = −0.795; p < 0.05). There was a trend toward significance between percent area stained with VEGF and intermittent pulse-inversion HI (r = −0.720; 0.05 < p < 0.10). No other comparisons were significant. In conclusion, contrast-enhanced US measures of tumor neovascularity in a human melanoma xenograft model appear to provide a noninvasive marker of angiogenesis corresponding to expression of COX-2. However, the sample size of this study is small and, until further studies have been conducted, these conclusions are preliminary. (E-mail:forsberg@esther.rad.tju.edu)

Keywords:  Ultrasound contrast agent, Melanoma, Murine xenograft model, Angiogenesis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0301-5629(02)00482-9

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 445-451, April 2002